GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Data Protection and Retention
- >
- StoreEver Tape Storage
- >
- DAT 40i - Compression failure
StoreEver Tape Storage
1849273
Members
6392
Online
104042
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-15-2002 05:01 AM
04-15-2002 05:01 AM
DAT 40i - Compression failure
Hi everyone!
I have two DAT40i drives i my computer (NT4.0)
and everything worked fine until i discovered that none of the drives passes HTT's compression test. The test states that compression i currently DIABLED! And the test fails upon enabling compression. My backups fails because of the amount of data beeing backuped. Help is wanted.
TIA
//Patrik
I have two DAT40i drives i my computer (NT4.0)
and everything worked fine until i discovered that none of the drives passes HTT's compression test. The test states that compression i currently DIABLED! And the test fails upon enabling compression. My backups fails because of the amount of data beeing backuped. Help is wanted.
TIA
//Patrik
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-07-2002 08:36 AM
06-07-2002 08:36 AM
Re: DAT 40i - Compression failure
We also have the same problem. The DDS4 tapes appear to hold the same amount of data (25GB)as our old DDS3's. We sent our first DAT 40 back because we thought it was faulty but he replacement drive is the same. When we run the test software it tells us that compression is disable by the switch underneath and fails if ask it to compress anyway.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-10-2002 12:39 AM
06-10-2002 12:39 AM
Re: DAT 40i - Compression failure
Having spent some more time trying different things I found the by moving all the switches back and forth so they end up back in the default positions has sort of fixed the problem. The test software no longer reports the switches are set incorrectly and the drive achieves 2.53:1 compression during the test. Maybe there is flux or something effecting the switches during production (just a guess).
However, during a backup of our normal data we still only get the same amount of data on our DDS4 tapes as we did on our old system with DDS3 tapes! We use exactly the same settings in NT backup for both systems so we would expect all our data to fit on one tape instead of one and a bit tapes (we backup around 28GBytes).
Also the test software reports after a normal backup a compression ratio of 1.-118:1. The "-" is not a typo on my part but actually appears in the report.
Any one got any suggestions?
However, during a backup of our normal data we still only get the same amount of data on our DDS4 tapes as we did on our old system with DDS3 tapes! We use exactly the same settings in NT backup for both systems so we would expect all our data to fit on one tape instead of one and a bit tapes (we backup around 28GBytes).
Also the test software reports after a normal backup a compression ratio of 1.-118:1. The "-" is not a typo on my part but actually appears in the report.
Any one got any suggestions?
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2026 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP