- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Data Protection and Retention
- >
- StoreEver Tape Storage
- >
- Miserable tape drive performance
StoreEver Tape Storage
1821817
Members
3598
Online
109638
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-18-2008 08:11 PM
12-18-2008 08:11 PM
Miserable tape drive performance
I am working with 2 brand new HP LTO-4 drives (in quantum superloader 3's), but they are defying my every attempt at speed. I spent a few days messing with them, and last night I got raw performance in LTT (Zeroes) to 130MB/s, but this morning for no explainable reason it's dropped back to 65MB/s. At the time I thought backdating the firmware had fixed the problem (from B35Z to B22Z. Both provided by Quantum), but it's become clear that didn't fix it.
Currently they run a consitant 65MB/s for zero's and in the low 50's for the 2:1 and 4:1 data. I have stuck my ear to the drive as it writes, and it will whirr for a second and stop, whirr for a second and stop. The progress meter does the same thing; burst and pause, burst and pause.
The drives are hooked up to a pair of PC's that are above and beyond the requisite specs. They are using PCI-e x1 Ultra320 SCSI cards (Adaptec). Interestingly, the Health report says my connection speed is set at 160MB/s, which is concerning, but shouldn't be directly affecting my tests (the tapes can only write 120MB/s native)
My only other thoughts has been the fact that the card is in a PCI-e x16 slot, but I have read that when downplugging the worst case is the board drops the bus to x1- which is all my card needs! I also wonder if the PCI-e graphics card might be hogging bandwidth, but PCI-e has seperate bus lanes by definition, and dropping the graphics to 800x600x16 doesn't seem to help.
Thanks!
note: this is all w/ LTT's tape drive performance test
Currently they run a consitant 65MB/s for zero's and in the low 50's for the 2:1 and 4:1 data. I have stuck my ear to the drive as it writes, and it will whirr for a second and stop, whirr for a second and stop. The progress meter does the same thing; burst and pause, burst and pause.
The drives are hooked up to a pair of PC's that are above and beyond the requisite specs. They are using PCI-e x1 Ultra320 SCSI cards (Adaptec). Interestingly, the Health report says my connection speed is set at 160MB/s, which is concerning, but shouldn't be directly affecting my tests (the tapes can only write 120MB/s native)
My only other thoughts has been the fact that the card is in a PCI-e x16 slot, but I have read that when downplugging the worst case is the board drops the bus to x1- which is all my card needs! I also wonder if the PCI-e graphics card might be hogging bandwidth, but PCI-e has seperate bus lanes by definition, and dropping the graphics to 800x600x16 doesn't seem to help.
Thanks!
note: this is all w/ LTT's tape drive performance test
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-19-2008 07:01 AM
12-19-2008 07:01 AM
Re: Miserable tape drive performance
If you have such an inconsitent performance test result using LTT "device performance test" (that is not involving the disk at all, just generating data from the memory server to the drive) I suspect you may have cables or terminator that are not working well.
Part of the first dialogue between the HBA and the target (drive) is to allow a "domain validation" that mean that the speed will be decided based on some tests on data exchange.
The negotiated speed may change if cables are not good up on reboot.
Part of the first dialogue between the HBA and the target (drive) is to allow a "domain validation" that mean that the speed will be decided based on some tests on data exchange.
The negotiated speed may change if cables are not good up on reboot.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP