- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Data Protection and Retention
- >
- StoreEver Tape Storage
- >
- Re: Ultrium 448 - taking 9 hours to backup 85GB
StoreEver Tape Storage
1755363
Members
3477
Online
108831
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-16-2007 03:32 AM
тАО07-16-2007 03:32 AM
Ultrium 448 - taking 9 hours to backup 85GB
We have a Storageworks 1U rack with two Ultrium 448 drives in it.
One drive is taking 9 hours to backup 85GB, the other takes 4 hours to backup 85GB.
Both drives are indentical in all aspects of hardware, firmware and connection settings.
The slow drive is backing up a DC and the fast drive is backing up a member server.
My theory is that the DC is just plain busy - we run 24/6 as we have both UK and Australasia offices working on both servers; however I thought I'd share the problem here in case there is anything you experts can think of that we've not done.
We have:
1. Updated firmware on both backup drives.
2. Updated firmware on each HDD of the DC.
3. Updated the firmware on the RAID controller.
4. Checked all software settings.
We haven't:
1. Swapped the drives around to see if its a faulty backup drive. This is our next step but we figure as the back is completing 100% is not going to be a hardware issue.
I'd appreciate any advice or help,
Regards,
Neil Robb
IT Co-ordinator
An International Recruitment Company
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-16-2007 03:48 AM
тАО07-16-2007 03:48 AM
Re: Ultrium 448 - taking 9 hours to backup 85GB
Neil, This document may help you. Also, Although block size is not supposed to make a difference for these drives, I have seen cases where changing block size to 64k does help. Try it and let us know.
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=lpg50460
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=lpg50460
"You can't lead the orchestra without turning your back to the crowd"
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-17-2007 08:13 AM
тАО07-17-2007 08:13 AM
Re: Ultrium 448 - taking 9 hours to backup 85GB
Hi Neil,
What I usually do to test if either server or tapedrive is the bottleneck, is create a tapedrive filetype to a null-device (either /dev/null (for Unix) or nul (for Windows).
This will prove if the hardware is causing delay or maybe the network. By creating the null-device on the clientsystem itself, you can also exlude networkinfluences.
You do not mention the backup application, but different settings in the application can cause delay as well. For instance Removable Storage Manager is notorious.
Good luck
Maarten
What I usually do to test if either server or tapedrive is the bottleneck, is create a tapedrive filetype to a null-device (either /dev/null (for Unix) or nul (for Windows).
This will prove if the hardware is causing delay or maybe the network. By creating the null-device on the clientsystem itself, you can also exlude networkinfluences.
You do not mention the backup application, but different settings in the application can cause delay as well. For instance Removable Storage Manager is notorious.
Good luck
Maarten
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP