- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- StoreVirtual Storage
- >
- iSCSI NIC teaming
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-15-2011 08:41 AM
11-15-2011 08:41 AM
iSCSI NIC teaming
Hello All,
I am seeing 85% iscsi interface utilization on my iscsi network adapter that is on physical windows 2003 host.
There is no NIC teaming for iSCSI even though I have 2 of them configured.
I have P4500 G2 28.8 SAN. Networking configured with ALB.
Can anyone tell me if HP recommends to do NIC teaming on my windows host? I know some manufacturers recommend not to.
Will jumbo frame configuration help me to resolve bottleneck on my GB network?
Can't do 10GB. not affordable at this time.
- Tags:
- iSCSI
- NIC Teaming
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-15-2011 09:58 AM
11-15-2011 09:58 AM
Re: iSCSI NIC teaming
Have you installed the HP DSM for MPIO?
This will install Windows MPIO and enable multipath support and load balancing for iSCSI.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-15-2011 10:13 AM
11-15-2011 10:13 AM
Re: iSCSI NIC teaming
I did but by looking at interface utilization sometimes only one iSCSI interface is used heavily. So it does not load balance correctly I suspect.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-15-2011 10:22 AM
11-15-2011 10:22 AM
Re: iSCSI NIC teaming
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-15-2011 10:27 AM
11-15-2011 10:27 AM
Re: iSCSI NIC teaming
Yes, I did. Specified different source IP and specified the target for each iSCSI adapter. I have MPIO policy set as round robin. By looking into task manager i see the both interfaces are being used so maybe it is working correctly. I have to look into my utilization reporting to see if it was incorrect.
But if I chose to minimize the utilization with the fact that there is no budget for it, do you know if configuring jumbo frames would help to minimize network utilization?
Thank you
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-15-2011 10:33 AM
11-15-2011 10:33 AM
Re: iSCSI NIC teaming
With 10Gbps jumbo frames is recommended for optimal throughput.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-15-2011 10:42 AM
11-15-2011 10:42 AM
Re: iSCSI NIC teaming
Flow control is not enabled. Not sure how evenly DSM MPIO is designed to balance the traffic but I don;t think it is working right. It is a small traffic when I took this snapshot. So if there would be larger traffic the difference would be substantial i think.