GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- StoreVirtual Storage
- >
- Performance Monitor and Remote Copies / Re-Stripin...
StoreVirtual Storage
1849809
Members
1976
Online
104044
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-23-2010 06:08 PM
08-23-2010 06:08 PM
Performance Monitor and Remote Copies / Re-Striping
I just kicked off several large remote copies from one cluster to another cluster in the same management group.
I was monitoring performance and noticed very little throughput when monitoring the "Throughput Total" for the two node cluster.
I'm running ALB.
When i add each explicit storage node and view their "Throughput Total" the values are more in line with what i would expect.
See attached snapshot or if you just want the numbers
Cluster "Throughput Total" 7,131 B/s
NSM4 "Throughput Total" 28,320,255 B/s
NSM5 "Throughput Total" 28,412,224 B/s
Why doesn't the sum of the storage nodes equal the cluster?
I was monitoring performance and noticed very little throughput when monitoring the "Throughput Total" for the two node cluster.
I'm running ALB.
When i add each explicit storage node and view their "Throughput Total" the values are more in line with what i would expect.
See attached snapshot or if you just want the numbers
Cluster "Throughput Total" 7,131 B/s
NSM4 "Throughput Total" 28,320,255 B/s
NSM5 "Throughput Total" 28,412,224 B/s
Why doesn't the sum of the storage nodes equal the cluster?
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-24-2010 11:06 AM
08-24-2010 11:06 AM
Re: Performance Monitor and Remote Copies / Re-Striping
I also discussed this with HP today.
They didn't give me a good answer. They were trying to say that this was the extra overhead that has to happen with Network Raid.
I think it's more of how they calculate/track - and that they exclude remote copies/striping in the cluster throughput total. It only seems to show ISCSI target related traffic.
As a test i simply launched a VM that was stored in a volume on this cluster and executed several large file copies. As soon as i did this the cluster throughput jumped as expected to come close to the individual nodes.
They didn't give me a good answer. They were trying to say that this was the extra overhead that has to happen with Network Raid.
I think it's more of how they calculate/track - and that they exclude remote copies/striping in the cluster throughput total. It only seems to show ISCSI target related traffic.
As a test i simply launched a VM that was stored in a volume on this cluster and executed several large file copies. As soon as i did this the cluster throughput jumped as expected to come close to the individual nodes.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2026 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP