- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Windows Server 2003
- >
- Need Disaster Recovery / Server Redundancy Suggest...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-04-2005 06:14 AM
12-04-2005 06:14 AM
My preference would be to have a 2-node server cluster, with node #2 in a different campus building, on our Intranet. Both nodes would of course need to be running EE. This means we would need to upgrade the existing tower from SE to EE, which hopefully can be done?
Is it a good idea for both cluster nodes to be as similar as possible, in terms of server hardware?
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Implementing-Two-Node-Cluster-Windows-2003-Enterprise.html
TIA - Jay
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-04-2005 07:06 AM
12-04-2005 07:06 AM
Re: Need Disaster Recovery / Server Redundancy Suggestions
You can do this by software like HP OpenView Storage Mirroring, Constantdata Replicator, etc.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-04-2005 08:07 AM
12-04-2005 08:07 AM
Re: Need Disaster Recovery / Server Redundancy Suggestions
you can upgrade windows 2003 SE to EE:
"Can I upgrade Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition to Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition"
http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/47541/47541.html
In order to provide full site redundancy you may decide to build geographically dispersed cluster and not standard server cluster. In this case you don't need identical hardware on both sites.
Windows clustering and geographically separate sites
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;280743
Geographically Dispersed Clusters in Windows Server 2003
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/techinfo/overview/clustergeo.mspx
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-04-2005 08:22 AM
12-04-2005 08:22 AM
SolutionHappy Holidays!
If you haven't already done so, you may want to investigate MS DPM:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/dpm/default.mspx
Make a great day!
Roger
Roger
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-04-2005 09:40 AM
12-04-2005 09:40 AM
Re: Need Disaster Recovery / Server Redundancy Suggestions
this software may be of some use.
http://www.nsisoftware.com/what-we-offer/double-take/
Phil
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-04-2005 09:57 AM
12-04-2005 09:57 AM
Re: Need Disaster Recovery / Server Redundancy Suggestions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-04-2005 07:26 PM
12-04-2005 07:26 PM
Re: Need Disaster Recovery / Server Redundancy Suggestions
If you are able to tolerate the loss of up to an hours worth of data with a recovery time of about the same, then you could look at a much cheaper solution such as http://sea.symantec.com/content/product.cfm?productid=23
Clustering will still leave you with your data store as a single point of failure.
HTH
Colin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-05-2005 01:53 AM
12-05-2005 01:53 AM
Re: Need Disaster Recovery / Server Redundancy Suggestions
MS Soln
Prashant S.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-05-2005 01:10 PM
12-05-2005 01:10 PM
Re: Need Disaster Recovery / Server Redundancy Suggestions
OK, I guess it's an American thing.
More later...
- Jay
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-05-2005 11:15 PM
12-05-2005 11:15 PM
Re: Need Disaster Recovery / Server Redundancy Suggestions
Would that be Yankee football or the beautiful game?!
Anyway.. to the matter in hand, following on in thre same vein as the previous post, as I'm a bit wary with anything Symantec stick their fingers in, have a look at Acronis Server for Windows Enterprise Edition. I know this works flawlessly with W2K3 and SBS W2K3, including Exchange and SQL. Very reasonably priced as well.. The rest of their lineup is pretty good as well!
http://www.acronis.com/enterprise/
All the best.. and Happy Xmas to you and everyone..
Omar
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-10-2006 11:49 PM
01-10-2006 11:49 PM