- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Windows Server 2003
- >
- Re: Trust nt vs win 2003
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-02-2005 03:45 AM
09-02-2005 03:45 AM
Trust nt vs win 2003
I have the following message of error when creating the trust between NT and 2003: "The local security authority is unable to obtain an RPC connection to the domain controller SERVERNT. Please check that the name can be resolved and that the server is available"
When creating the trust in NT is satisfactory, and in 20003 it swhows the error message.
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-02-2005 04:31 AM
09-02-2005 04:31 AM
Re: Trust nt vs win 2003
After that, configure the DNS server for the 2003 domain to use the NT4 DNS server as forwarder.
You must create an "External trust relationship".
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-02-2005 04:36 AM
09-02-2005 04:36 AM
Re: Trust nt vs win 2003
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;197808
lmhosts
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/180094/EN-US/
Trust
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;308195
Jon
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-02-2005 09:33 AM
09-02-2005 09:33 AM
Re: Trust nt vs win 2003
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-03-2005 01:12 AM
09-03-2005 01:12 AM
Re: Trust nt vs win 2003
How current is the NT system in regards to security updates? Some RPC calls have been modified to improve security and require updates on most MS O/Ses.
Paul
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-06-2005 07:13 AM
09-06-2005 07:13 AM
Re: Trust nt vs win 2003
The service RPC is automatic and started with the account of local system, this is in the Windows Server 2003.
In others servers the service RPC is automatic and started with the account "AUTHORITY\NetworkService".
I cannot modify the options of the service RPC, and I cannot stop or reinitiate this service
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-06-2005 08:04 AM
09-06-2005 08:04 AM
Re: Trust nt vs win 2003
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;325874
Section Troubleshooting.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-21-2006 03:10 AM
03-21-2006 03:10 AM
Re: Trust nt vs win 2003
Did anyone ever figure this one out? I'm seeing it now when attempting to establish a trust to a domain with either an NTv4 SP6(+all available security patches) PDC or an Advanced Server v7.3A ECO4 (+RPC patch) PDC.
I can avoid the error in one of two ways:
1. From the W2K3 SP1 DC map a drive to the PDC of the other domain as an administrator of that domain (using any admin account).
2. Have identically named admin accounts in both domains which have identical passwords and use that account on the W2K3 SP1 DC to create the trust.
Thanks,
Paul
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-11-2006 10:50 PM
04-11-2006 10:50 PM
Re: Trust nt vs win 2003
The problem arises when you try to create trust between the 2 domain and the NT4 side of the trust is already in place.
To resolve this error, delete the trust from the NT4 side, and start the creation of trust from the windows 2003 AD.
I have seen this error somany times and the only solution that have worked all the time is to delete the trust from the NT 4 domain and start from the AD
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-12-2006 01:22 AM
04-12-2006 01:22 AM
Re: Trust nt vs win 2003
Well, unfortunately that doesn't work for me. I get the same error regardless of whether the other side of the trust exists or not.
In a trace I can see the W2K3 server never attempts to establish an anonymous session with the NT or Advanced Server PDC.
It tries using the credentials I've used to login to the W2K3 system (which is why it works when you have the same named account with identical passwords in both domains).
Or if you have an existing session from the w2k3 server to the NT or Advanced Server PDC (i.e, a mapped drive) using an administrator account in the NT or Advanced Server domain, it piggybacks on that session.
But the big difference when it works and doesn't is the presence of an anonymous session setup request from the W2K3 server.
So anyone know why a W2K3 server wouldn't attempt an _outbound_ anonymous session?
Regards,
Paul