HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- DecNET over IP perfomance
Operating System - OpenVMS
1828664
Members
1748
Online
109984
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-19-2004 04:22 PM
02-19-2004 04:22 PM
DecNET over IP perfomance
Hi.
Has anybody knows DecNET over IP perfomance in compare with pure DecNET IV phase. How much DecNET over IP slover in average.
We have network master program on Alpha originaly wroted to use DecNET. This program transmit data from server to client's PC. When this program been rewroted to use IP perfomance of data transmition reduces 2 times slover at least (depends of useful data size in 1,5K packet of IP).
Has anybody knows DecNET over IP perfomance in compare with pure DecNET IV phase. How much DecNET over IP slover in average.
We have network master program on Alpha originaly wroted to use DecNET. This program transmit data from server to client's PC. When this program been rewroted to use IP perfomance of data transmition reduces 2 times slover at least (depends of useful data size in 1,5K packet of IP).
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-19-2004 07:32 PM
02-19-2004 07:32 PM
Re: DecNET over IP perfomance
Hello Enemy,
I have not direct information about compare performance between DecNet IV and DecNet V but I think problem is not over DecNet over IP.
You could explain more detail about your application; I can't understand how write data from server to client; may be on client run a FAL.EXE (and you are running pathwork32 on PC) or you recall a DecNet Remote Procedure Call.
Now how you modify application? Use transfer again using FAL on client? DO you upgrade a client software? Server software is changed, also OS and TCP/IP?
There no way to make an accuractly response without furthermore details.
Regards
Antoniov
I have not direct information about compare performance between DecNet IV and DecNet V but I think problem is not over DecNet over IP.
You could explain more detail about your application; I can't understand how write data from server to client; may be on client run a FAL.EXE (and you are running pathwork32 on PC) or you recall a DecNet Remote Procedure Call.
Now how you modify application? Use transfer again using FAL on client? DO you upgrade a client software? Server software is changed, also OS and TCP/IP?
There no way to make an accuractly response without furthermore details.
Regards
Antoniov
Antonio Maria Vigliotti
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-19-2004 08:11 PM
02-19-2004 08:11 PM
Re: DecNET over IP perfomance
Master program on AXP and PC-client uses DecNET sockets to compunicate each other. I don't really known details of comunication algorithm so far - where are using third party software.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-20-2004 01:04 AM
02-20-2004 01:04 AM
Re: DecNET over IP perfomance
Hello
We run DECnet over IP and Phase V. When speed is an issue, we use, for example, ftp instead of $ Copy (i.e., Copy/FTP does IP only as well).
Sounds like your application has been rewritten to use IP instead of DECnet which means the DECnet stack on the PC plays an important part in performance. Another factor in performance is how the PC's IP stack hands off the packet to DECnet. So both have an impact on performance.
Now that you have bypassed DECnet, it makes sense that you run faster using just IP. It also makes sense that your rewritten app now using just IP is 2x faster (if I misunderstood this, let me know) since most performance gains are from recoding an app.
That said . . . in my environment, we don't see enough difference to worry about DECnet-over-IP vs. IP performance on a daily basis. File copies that take an hour plus or minus a few minutes are okay. But it is always VMS talking to VMS; no PC's are involved. Though memory serves that PC DECnet are noticably slow, but that was 10 years ago.
Since the DECnet packet is encapsulated within an IP packet, you have CPU overhead to handle all this, but for our environment we can't measure the CPU impact; I know their is CPU overhead, but frankly, it is too small for us to dig into any deeper (remember this is on the VMS systems, not the PC -- the DECnet stack on a PC may or may not have a lot of overhead).
For an actual copy that takes 1 hour we see some small improvements when using ftp but nothing to write home about.
Let me know if I can clarify anything about our experience in this area.
john
We run DECnet over IP and Phase V. When speed is an issue, we use, for example, ftp instead of $ Copy (i.e., Copy/FTP does IP only as well).
Sounds like your application has been rewritten to use IP instead of DECnet which means the DECnet stack on the PC plays an important part in performance. Another factor in performance is how the PC's IP stack hands off the packet to DECnet. So both have an impact on performance.
Now that you have bypassed DECnet, it makes sense that you run faster using just IP. It also makes sense that your rewritten app now using just IP is 2x faster (if I misunderstood this, let me know) since most performance gains are from recoding an app.
That said . . . in my environment, we don't see enough difference to worry about DECnet-over-IP vs. IP performance on a daily basis. File copies that take an hour plus or minus a few minutes are okay. But it is always VMS talking to VMS; no PC's are involved. Though memory serves that PC DECnet are noticably slow, but that was 10 years ago.
Since the DECnet packet is encapsulated within an IP packet, you have CPU overhead to handle all this, but for our environment we can't measure the CPU impact; I know their is CPU overhead, but frankly, it is too small for us to dig into any deeper (remember this is on the VMS systems, not the PC -- the DECnet stack on a PC may or may not have a lot of overhead).
For an actual copy that takes 1 hour we see some small improvements when using ftp but nothing to write home about.
Let me know if I can clarify anything about our experience in this area.
john
It is better to STQ then LDQ
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP