- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
- >
- Re: poor drive performance
ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
1756482
Members
3069
Online
108848
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-16-2001 04:00 PM
тАО01-16-2001 04:00 PM
poor drive performance
ML370R 800Mhz, 512 MB Ram, Integrated Smart Controller, 3 x 18 GB drives, Raid 5.
As a file server, the file performance is good for document retrieval and copy processes. Poor performance for end user using MS Backup to backup server data to laptop. Process is taking 4 times as long as on Previous Proliant 1600 (166 Mhz, 256 MB RAM).
As a file server, the file performance is good for document retrieval and copy processes. Poor performance for end user using MS Backup to backup server data to laptop. Process is taking 4 times as long as on Previous Proliant 1600 (166 Mhz, 256 MB RAM).
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-23-2001 04:00 PM
тАО01-23-2001 04:00 PM
Re: poor drive performance
have a look at your NIC, don?t use Full Duplex mode.
have a look at your Anti Virus Software, something different to your PL1600?
A file don't?I use the processor much. Never use raid5 on nt4 System drive!!
Use Raid 1 for NT System drive!! Use Raid 5 only for Filesystem.
Raid5 with 3 Drive hase a poor performance at write. Nt4 write every time!
have a look at your Anti Virus Software, something different to your PL1600?
A file don't?I use the processor much. Never use raid5 on nt4 System drive!!
Use Raid 1 for NT System drive!! Use Raid 5 only for Filesystem.
Raid5 with 3 Drive hase a poor performance at write. Nt4 write every time!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-14-2001 04:00 PM
тАО02-14-2001 04:00 PM
Re: poor drive performance
Thanks for the tips and suggestions , Olaf Kniess
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP