- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE BladeSystem
- >
- BladeSystem - General
- >
- Re: Confusion on the network interface aspect of b...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-17-2011 12:02 AM
тАО03-17-2011 12:02 AM
Confusion on the network interface aspect of blade servers?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-17-2011 12:12 AM
тАО03-17-2011 12:12 AM
Re: Confusion on the network interface aspect of blade servers?
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c01508406/c01508406.pdf
The C7000 is designed for High Availability.
Port 1 on the embbeded nic (LOM) is routet to Interconnect bay (IB) 1.
Port 2 on the LOM is routet to IB 2.
On the half hight blades.
The full hight servers got 4 LOMs, so they got 2 connection to each IB.
The C3000 is a C7000 cut on the middle.
You got the same number of LOMs on the servers, and the same number of port in the switches. So 2 (HH)/ 4 (FH) connections to each Interconnect.
Port mapping is the same for all switch modles.
Heres link for the tech brief to the C7000 also:
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c00816246/c00816246.pdf
By the way. HP got a lot of technology bries on the web.
Try google, what ever HW you like to know aboute, end then technology brief. Don't be to accurate.
BR
/jag
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-17-2011 03:13 AM
тАО03-17-2011 03:13 AM
Re: Confusion on the network interface aspect of blade servers?
You need to be a little careful, since the port mappings on a c3000 are NOT quite the same as the c7000.
For example, in a C7000, the blade server Onboard NICs, (LOMs) are mapped to interconnect bays 1 and 2 (odd numbers to bay 1, and even numbers to bay 2). On a c3000, the LOMs are ALL mapped to Interconnect Bay 1. From this it can be seen that Interconnect Bay 1 MUST contain an Ethernet capable module of some type.
In order to get Network redundancy, (i.e. NIC Teaming), you will need to put a second (preferably matching) ethernet module in Interconnect Bay 2, and an ethernet Mezzanine card on Mezz Slot 1 on all of your blade servers.
Note also, I dont thing that the GbE2c switch is capable of 10Gb communication, even though your Blade NICs are.
The downlinks between the blade and the Interconnect bay are Hard-wired, and you really dont need to worry too much about them, however, take a look at,
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c01508406/c01508406.pdf
Figure 11.
Dave.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-22-2011 01:09 PM
тАО03-22-2011 01:09 PM
Re: Confusion on the network interface aspect of blade servers?
I know this might be closer of a network question, than a Blade server question, so if I need to post to the network side, let me know.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-23-2011 06:40 PM
тАО03-23-2011 06:40 PM
Re: Confusion on the network interface aspect of blade servers?
Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-25-2011 07:34 AM
тАО03-25-2011 07:34 AM
Re: Confusion on the network interface aspect of blade servers?
To get a clearer picture, log in to the OnBoard Administrator. In the pane on the left, expand interconnect bays; select an interconnect module, and expand to Ports. You will see how each blade is mapped to that interconnect module.
In the pane on the left, expand device bays, select a blade, expand to Ports. You will see how each LOM (and Mezzanine adapters, if installed) is mapped to an interconnect module.
Hope this helps. Virtual Connect can be interesting. Make sure you enable NPIV on each fabric switch port connected to your VCFC.