- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- Comware Based
- >
- Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-15-2016 09:34 AM
тАО12-15-2016 09:34 AM
Hi,
we encounter here a LACP problem between two devices, this LACP is constructed with two Ten Gigabit interfaces on each side. :
- HPE5700-32XGT-8XG-2QSFP+ (interfacename =Bridgeaggregation33 [ XGE1/0/33 + XGE2/0/33 ])
- Cisco 6509 (interfacename=Po14 [ Te1/3 + Te3/3 ]).
Randomly, once a week, the Cisco 6509 set PortChannel 14 in errdisabled state and cut the link to the HPE5700 with the following message :
CET: %PM-SPSTBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: channel-misconfig error detected on Te1/3, putting Te1/3 in err-disable state CET: %PM-SPSTBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: channel-misconfig error detected on Te3/3, putting Te3/3 in err-disable state %PM-SPSTBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: channel-misconfig error detected on Po14, putting Te1/3 in err-disable state
On the same time these logs appears on HPE5700 :
<190>Dec 3 02:33:59 2016 SWITCH %%10LAGG/6/LAGG_INACTIVE_CONFIGURATION: Member port XGE1/0/33 of aggregation group BAGG33 changed to the inactive state, because the aggregation configuration of the port is incorrect. <190>Dec 3 02:34:00 2016 SWITCH %%10LAGG/6/LAGG_ACTIVE: Member port XGE1/0/33 of aggregation group BAGG33 changed to the active state. <190>Dec 3 02:34:00 2016 SWITCH %%10LAGG/6/LAGG_INACTIVE_CONFIGURATION: Member port XGE2/0/33 of aggregation group BAGG33 changed to the inactive state, because the aggregation configuration of the port is incorrect. <190>Dec 3 02:34:00 2016 SWITCH %%10LAGG/6/LAGG_INACTIVE_PHYSTATE: Member port XGE1/0/33 of aggregation group BAGG33 changed to the inactive state, because the physical state of the port is down. <187>Dec 3 02:34:00 2016 SWITCH %%10IFNET/3/PHY_UPDOWN: Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 link status is down. <189>Dec 3 02:34:00 2016 SWITCH %%10IFNET/5/LINK_UPDOWN: Line protocol on the interface Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 is down. <187>Dec 3 02:34:00 2016 SWITCH %%10IFNET/3/PHY_UPDOWN: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 link status is down. <189>Dec 3 02:34:00 2016 SWITCH %%10IFNET/5/LINK_UPDOWN: Line protocol on the interface Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 is down. <190>Dec 3 02:34:00 2016 SWITCH %%10LAGG/6/LAGG_INACTIVE_PHYSTATE: Member port XGE1/0/33 of aggregation group BAGG33 changed to the inactive state, because the physical state of the port is down. <187>Dec 3 02:34:00 2016 SWITCH %%10IFNET/3/PHY_UPDOWN: Bridge-Aggregation33 link status is down. <189>Dec 3 02:34:00 2016 SWITCH %%10IFNET/5/LINK_UPDOWN: Line protocol on the interface Bridge-Aggregation33 is down.
Reading the logs, it seems there is an event on HPE5700 around bridge aggregation 33 port members. This event seems produce the err-disable protection on the cisco side..After five minutes the Cisco leave the err-disable state on the portchannel 14 and all works like a charm...
.We have read the docs and guides about LACP but we can't identify the reason of this random event on the HPE5700. I want precise there is no errors on the links between cisco and HP.
We use the following configuratoin on the HP :
Config
interface Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 description "XXXXXXXXXX" port link-type trunk port trunk permit vlan all port link-aggregation group 33 interface Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 description "XXXXXXXXXX" port link-type trunk port trunk permit vlan all port link-aggregation group 33 interface Bridge-Aggregation33 description "YYYYYYYYY" port link-type trunk port trunk permit vlan all link-aggregation mode dynamic
State
display interface Ten-GigabitEthernet 1/0/33 Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 Current state: UP Line protocol state: UP IP packet frame type: Ethernet II, hardware address: e8f7-24b9-411c Description: "palays port" Bandwidth: 10000000 kbps Loopback is not set Media type is optical fiber, port hardware type is 10G_BASE_SR_SFP 10Gbps-speed mode, full-duplex mode Link speed type is autonegotiation, link duplex type is autonegotiation Flow-control is not enabled Maximum frame length: 10000 Allow jumbo frames to pass Broadcast max-ratio: 100% Multicast max-ratio: 100% Unicast max-ratio: 100% PVID: 1 MDI type: Automdix Port link-type: Trunk display interface Ten-GigabitEthernet 2/0/33 Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 Current state: UP Line protocol state: UP IP packet frame type: Ethernet II, hardware address: e8f7-24b6-9ae3 Description: "palays port" Bandwidth: 10000000 kbps Loopback is not set Media type is optical fiber, port hardware type is 10G_BASE_SR_SFP 10Gbps-speed mode, full-duplex mode Link speed type is autonegotiation, link duplex type is autonegotiation Flow-control is not enabled Maximum frame length: 10000 Allow jumbo frames to pass Broadcast max-ratio: 100% Multicast max-ratio: 100% Unicast max-ratio: 100% PVID: 1 MDI type: Automdix Port link-type: Trunk display interface Bridge-Aggregation 33 Bridge-Aggregation33 Current state: UP IP packet frame type: Ethernet II, hardware address: e8f7-24b9-411c Description: "Aggregation de liens vers palays" Bandwidth: 20000000 kbps 20Gbps-speed mode, full-duplex mode Link speed type is autonegotiation, link duplex type is autonegotiation PVID: 1 Port link-type: Trunk
Thanks for your help or advices
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-15-2016 09:41 AM
тАО12-15-2016 09:41 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
hello
shall you post firmware versions for both please
thanks
JY
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-15-2016 06:22 PM
тАО12-15-2016 06:22 PM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
What if you use link aggregation-mode static instead of dynamic?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-16-2016 04:44 AM
тАО12-16-2016 04:44 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
the firmware versions :
HPE5700 :
Current software images: ! flash:/5700-cmw710-boot-r2422p01.bin ! flash:/5700-cmw710-system-r2422p01.bin
Cisco 6509 :
Image: Software: s72033_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M, 12.2(33)SXJ9, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc4) !Image: Compiled: Mon 16-Mar-15 14:07 by prod_rel_team !Image: disk1:s72033-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SXJ9.bin
Hope this can help
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-16-2016 04:46 AM
тАО12-16-2016 04:46 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
We don't test it.
This link join network core router to our server switch stack.......
Do you think this can resolve the issue ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-16-2016 07:59 AM - edited тАО12-16-2016 08:01 AM
тАО12-16-2016 07:59 AM - edited тАО12-16-2016 08:01 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
What is the display link-aggregation verbose command's output on the HPE 5700?
Mumble Mumble...you cited stack ("This link join network core router to our server switch stack......."), do you have an IRF Stack of HPE 5700 units or just a single HPE 5700 Switch?
I'm not an HPE Employee

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-16-2016 08:51 AM
тАО12-16-2016 08:51 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
should be great to be in Static in both side if problem still occured
debug lacp on cisco side witl help to get more details
JY
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-16-2016 09:47 AM
тАО12-16-2016 09:47 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
display link-aggregation verbose Bridge-Aggregation 33 Loadsharing Type: Shar -- Loadsharing, NonS -- Non-Loadsharing Port Status: S -- Selected, U -- Unselected, I -- Individual, * -- Management port Flags: A -- LACP_Activity, B -- LACP_Timeout, C -- Aggregation, D -- Synchronization, E -- Collecting, F -- Distributing, G -- Defaulted, H -- Expired Aggregate Interface: Bridge-Aggregation33 Aggregation Mode: Dynamic Loadsharing Type: Shar Management VLAN : None System ID: 0x8000, e8f7-24b9-40d3 Local: Port Status Priority Oper-Key Flag -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- XGE1/0/33 S 32768 1 {ACDEF} XGE2/0/33 S 32768 1 {ACDEF} Remote: Actor Partner Priority Oper-Key SystemID Flag -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- XGE1/0/33 260 32768 14 0x8000, 0011-5dbe-3000 {ACDEF} XGE2/0/33 772 32768 14 0x8000, 0011-5dbe-3000 {ACDEF}
Yes we have an IRF Stack of two HPE switch
display irf MemberID Role Priority CPU-Mac Description *+1 Master 32 00e0-fc0f-8c02 --- 2 Standby 1 00e0-fc0f-8c03 --- -------------------------------------------------- * indicates the device is the master. + indicates the device through which the user logs in. The bridge MAC of the IRF is: e8f7-24b9-40d3 Auto upgrade : yes Mac persistent : always Domain ID : 0 IRF mode : normal
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-16-2016 09:56 AM
тАО12-16-2016 09:56 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
We will attempt this config if the error come again
thks for your advice
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-19-2016 07:57 AM - last edited on тАО06-20-2022 11:12 PM by Sunitha_Mod
тАО12-19-2016 07:57 AM - last edited on тАО06-20-2022 11:12 PM by Sunitha_Mod
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
The only gotcha with static link-agg is that the links never go down. If something happens, you'll be sending packets into a abyss.
I would debug lacp on the 5700's as well to see what is causing this event.
You might also want to check Spanning Tree, if it is enabled, to see if one of the ports is blocked.
David
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-19-2016 11:56 AM
тАО12-19-2016 11:56 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
thks for the reply
i can't enable debug lacp on 5700...
no more information, is there specific command to get debug events sent to syslog like other events on hp5700 ?
same at cisco level i had enable debugging lacp events and error but no more results...
we think about set the cisco in LACP passive mode and kept hp5700 in LACP active mode but i don't know if that can have an effect on our problem..
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-19-2016 12:31 PM
тАО12-19-2016 12:31 PM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
Hi!
Use this command... > debug link-aggregation lacp packet You can then choose all, send, or receive.
If you are sending debug to syslog you should be all set. That is done in the information-center.
Regards,
David
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-28-2016 06:06 AM - edited тАО12-28-2016 06:07 AM
тАО12-28-2016 06:06 AM - edited тАО12-28-2016 06:07 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
This may help, it may not. Attached is the pertinent config from our 3Com XRN switch stack doing EtherChannel with our Cisco 6509E VSS cluster. Comware version 3.03.02s168p23, Cisco IOS version 15.1(1)SY.
Cisco
interface Port-channel7
description \\ Link to Ground floor //
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
!
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/2/1
description \\ Ground Floor 3Com XRN //
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
logging event link-status
channel-protocol lacp
channel-group 7 mode active
!
interface TenGigabitEthernet2/2/1
description \\ Ground Floor 3Com XRN //
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
logging event link-status
channel-protocol lacp
channel-group 7 mode active
3Com
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/1
port link-type trunk
port trunk permit vlan all
undo jumboframe enable
gvrp
lacp enable
#
interface TenGigabitEthernet2/1/1
port link-type trunk
port trunk permit vlan all
undo jumboframe enable
gvrp
lacp enable
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-03-2017 05:12 AM
тАО01-03-2017 05:12 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
thanks for your reply...
it seems we are running the same config here.....
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-03-2017 05:45 AM
тАО01-03-2017 05:45 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
thanks for the information
We have enabled the debug en we get logs about lacp on our syslog server.
It seems the cisco break the link but i'm not sure about that
attached logs from H3C 5700 with lacp debug activated.
It seems the H3c stack receive lacp information (FSM.RX) from cisco saying " i disable the port" :
02:31:56 2016 sw-csn-srv %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 FSM.RX CURRENT-->PORT_DISABLED, Port_Disabled 02:31:57 2016 sw-csn-srv %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 FSM.RX CURRENT-->PORT_DISABLED, Port_Disabled
That seems indicate that it's the cisco wich cut the link.....
I can't enable lacp debug on 6509, the debug lacp command seems not exist on our Cisco OS
s72033_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M, 12.2(33)SXJ9, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc4)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-03-2017 05:47 AM
тАО01-03-2017 05:47 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
hi
this configuration did ever worked or always experimented this issue ?
what are cisco version ?
JY
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-03-2017 05:57 AM
тАО01-03-2017 05:57 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
shall you post
show tech from cisco device please
JY
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-03-2017 06:03 AM
тАО01-03-2017 06:03 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
this configuration is up since 3 months now and we encounter this random problem immediately after we setup this
but this problem seems to be linked to event on the network.....
This problem occur randomly once a week.
we have this link down mostly at the same time range, approximatively 2:30 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-03-2017 06:28 AM
тАО01-03-2017 06:28 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
------------------ show clock ------------------ 15:12:10.526 CET Tue Jan 3 2017 ------------------ show version ------------------ Cisco IOS Software, s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.2(33)SXJ9, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc4) Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport Copyright (c) 1986-2015 by Cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Mon 16-Mar-15 14:07 by prod_rel_team ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(17r)S2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) XXXX uptime is 44 weeks, 6 days, 3 hours, 5 minutes Uptime for this control processor is 44 weeks, 6 days, 3 hours, 2 minutes Time since XXXX switched to active is 44 weeks, 6 days, 3 hours, 5 minutes System returned to ROM by reload at 08:28:08 CET Wed Oct 5 2011 (SP by reload) System restarted at 12:06:44 CET Wed Feb 24 2016 System image file is "disk1:s72033-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SXJ9.bin" Last reload reason: bus error at PC 0x41687C74, address 0xD0D0E3D This product contains cryptographic features and is subject to United States and local country laws governing import, export, transfer and use. Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does not imply third-party authority to import, export, distribute or use encryption. Importers, exporters, distributors and users are responsible for compliance with U.S. and local country laws. By using this product you agree to comply with applicable laws and regulations. If you are unable to comply with U.S. and local laws, return this product immediately. A summary of U.S. laws governing Cisco cryptographic products may be found at: http://www.cisco.com/wwl/export/crypto/tool/stqrg.html If you require further assistance please contact us by sending email to export@cisco.com. cisco WS-C6509-E (R7000) processor (revision 1.1) with 458720K/65536K bytes of memory. Processor board ID SAL08290QNN SR71000 CPU at 600Mhz, Implementation 0x504, Rev 1.2, 512KB L2 Cache Last reset from power-on 116 Virtual Ethernet interfaces 90 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
Here the show version result with os version...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-03-2017 06:36 AM
тАО01-03-2017 06:36 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
should be hardware issue
shall you post
display diag from HP switch
show tech from Cisco switch
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-04-2017 03:44 AM
тАО01-04-2017 03:44 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
Hi
I can't publish all the conf of our cisco......
reading show tech or show diags there is no physical errors on the links.
We think about STP problem/event...
We successfully enable lacp and stp logs on cisco for now and we are wainting the next random error.
thks for your help and advices
regards
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-19-2017 05:31 AM - edited тАО01-19-2017 05:34 AM
тАО01-19-2017 05:31 AM - edited тАО01-19-2017 05:34 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
The error come again on our switchs.....
Reading and analyzing the logs it seems linked to server reboot.
The attached doc show our network topology.
The server reboot all the nights ├а 2:30 AM.
Every 3 weeks, this reboot is followed by a channel-misconfig error on Port-channel 14 of the Cisco 6500.
But the logs below seems indicate it's the hp5700 which cut the port for unknown reason and when the port come up in the followiong seconds there is a channel misconfiguration detection at the Cisco level.
Logs for the H3C 5700 switch :
Jan 19 02:31:50 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 FSM.RX CURRENT-- Jan 19 02:31:50 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/35 FSM.PTX PERIODIC_TX-- Jan 19 02:31:50 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/35 FSM.PTX SLOW_PERIODIC-- Jan 19 02:31:50 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Packet: -Slot=2; PACKET.Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33.receive. size=110, subtype=1, version=1 Actor: type=1, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=0011-5dbe-3000, key=0xe, pri=0x8000, port-index=0x304, state=0x3d Partner: type=2, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=e8f7-24b9-40d3, key=0x1, pri=0x8000, port-index=0xee, state=0x3d Collector: type=3, len=16, col-max-delay=0x8000 Terminator: type=0, len=0 Jan 19 02:31:50 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Packet: -Slot=2; PACKET.Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/35.send. size=110, subtype=1, version=1 Actor: type=1, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=e8f7-24b9-40d3, key=0x2, pri=0x8000, port-index=0xf0, state=0x3d Partner: type=2, len=20, sys-pri=0x1, sys-mac=02a0-9895-db05, key=0x1, pri=0x0, port-index=0x2, state=0x3d Collector: type=3, len=16, col-max-delay=0x0 Terminator: type=0, len=0 Jan 19 02:31:51 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 FSM.ACTOR-CHURN ACTOR_CHURN_MONITOR-- Jan 19 02:31:51 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 FSM.ACTOR-CHURN NO_ACTOR_CHURN-- Jan 19 02:31:51 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 FSM.ACTOR-CHURN NO_ACTOR_CHURN-- Jan 19 02:31:51 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 FSM.MUX ATTACHED-- Jan 19 02:31:51 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 FSM.MUX ATTACHED-- Jan 19 02:31:51 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 FSM.MUX ATTACHED-- Jan 19 02:31:51 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 FSM.MUX COLLECTING_DISTRIBUTING-- Jan 19 02:31:51 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 FSM.MUX COLLECTING_DISTRIBUTING-- Jan 19 02:31:51 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 FSM.MUX DETACHED-- Jan 19 02:31:51 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 FSM.MUX WAITING-- Jan 19 02:31:51 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 FSM.PARTNER-CHURN NO_PARTNER_CHURN-- Jan 19 02:31:51 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 FSM.RX CURRENT-- Jan 19 02:31:51 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 FSM.RX CURRENT-- Jan 19 02:31:51 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Packet: -Slot=2; PACKET.Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33.receive. size=110, subtype=1, version=1 Actor: type=1, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=0011-5dbe-3000, key=0xe, pri=0x8000, port-index=0x304, state=0x1 Partner: type=2, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=e8f7-24b9-40d3, key=0x1, pri=0x8000, port-index=0xee, state=0x3d Collector: type=3, len=16, col-max-delay=0x8000 Terminator: type=0, len=0 Jan 19 02:31:51 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Packet: -Slot=2; PACKET.Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33.send. size=110, subtype=1, version=1 Actor: type=1, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=e8f7-24b9-40d3, key=0x1, pri=0x8000, port-index=0xee, state=0x3d Partner: type=2, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=0011-5dbe-3000, key=0xe, pri=0x8000, port-index=0x304, state=0x9 Collector: type=3, len=16, col-max-delay=0x0 Terminator: type=0, len=0 Jan 19 02:31:51 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Packet: -Slot=2; PACKET.Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33.send. size=110, subtype=1, version=1 Actor: type=1, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=e8f7-24b9-40d3, key=0x1, pri=0x8000, port-index=0xee, state=0x5 Partner: type=2, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=0011-5dbe-3000, key=0xe, pri=0x8000, port-index=0x304, state=0x9 Collector: type=3, len=16, col-max-delay=0x0 Terminator: type=0, len=0 Jan 19 02:31:51 2017 hp5700 %%10LLDP/6/LLDP_DELETE_NEIGHBOR: -Slot=2; Nearest bridge agent neighbor deleted on Port Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 (IfIndex 238), Chassis ID is 0011-5dbe-3000, Port ID is Te3/3. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10IFNET/3/PHY_UPDOWN: Bridge-Aggregation33 link status is down. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10IFNET/3/PHY_UPDOWN: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 link status is down. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10IFNET/3/PHY_UPDOWN: Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 link status is down. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10IFNET/5/LINK_UPDOWN: Line protocol on the interface Bridge-Aggregation33 is down. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10IFNET/5/LINK_UPDOWN: Line protocol on the interface Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 is down. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10IFNET/5/LINK_UPDOWN: Line protocol on the interface Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 is down. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10IFNET/5/LINK_UPDOWN: Line protocol on the interface Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 is down. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10IFNET/5/LINK_UPDOWN: Line protocol on the interface Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/33 is up. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/6/LAGG_ACTIVE: Member port XGE1/0/33 of aggregation group BAGG33 changed to the active state. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/6/LAGG_ACTIVE: Member port XGE2/0/33 of aggregation group BAGG33 changed to the active state. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/6/LAGG_INACTIVE_CONFIGURATION: Member port XGE1/0/33 of aggregation group BAGG33 changed to the inactive state, because the aggregation configuration of the port is incorrect. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/6/LAGG_INACTIVE_CONFIGURATION: Member port XGE1/0/33 of aggregation group BAGG33 changed to the inactive state, because the aggregation configuration of the port is incorrect. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/6/LAGG_INACTIVE_CONFIGURATION: Member port XGE2/0/33 of aggregation group BAGG33 changed to the inactive state, because the aggregation configuration of the port is incorrect. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/6/LAGG_INACTIVE_PHYSTATE: Member port XGE2/0/33 of aggregation group BAGG33 changed to the inactive state, because the physical state of the port is down. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Event: Group 33 updated because of member port up/down. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Event: Group 33 updated because of member port up/down. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Event: Group 33 updated because of partner port other reason. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Event: Group 33 updated because of partner port other reason. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Event: Group 33 updated because of partner port other reason. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Event: Group 33 updated because of partner port other reason. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Event: Group 33 updated because of partner port other reason. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Event: Group 33 updated because of partner port other reason. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Event: Group 33 updated because of partner port other reason. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Event: Group 33 updated because of partner port other reason. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Event: Group 33 updated because of partner port other reason. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Event: Group 33 updated because of partner port other reason. Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 FSM.ACTOR-CHURN ACTOR_CHURN_MONITOR-- Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 FSM.ACTOR-CHURN NO_ACTOR_CHURN-- Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 FSM.ACTOR-CHURN NO_ACTOR_CHURN-- Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 FSM.MUX ATTACHED-- Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 FSM.MUX ATTACHED-- Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 FSM.MUX ATTACHED-- Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 FSM.MUX COLLECTING_DISTRIBUTING-- Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 FSM.MUX COLLECTING_DISTRIBUTING-- Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 FSM.MUX DETACHED-- Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 FSM.MUX WAITING-- Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 FSM.PARTNER-CHURN NO_PARTNER_CHURN-- Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 FSM.RX CURRENT-- Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 FSM.RX CURRENT-- Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Packet: PACKET.Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33.receive. size=110, subtype=1, version=1 Actor: type=1, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=0011-5dbe-3000, key=0xe, pri=0x8000, port-index=0x104, state=0x1 Partner: type=2, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=e8f7-24b9-40d3, key=0x1, pri=0x8000, port-index=0x21, state=0x3d Collector: type=3, len=16, col-max-delay=0x8000 Terminator: type=0, len=0 Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Packet: PACKET.Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33.send. size=110, subtype=1, version=1 Actor: type=1, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=e8f7-24b9-40d3, key=0x1, pri=0x8000, port-index=0x21, state=0x3d Partner: type=2, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=0011-5dbe-3000, key=0xe, pri=0x8000, port-index=0x104, state=0x9 Collector: type=3, len=16, col-max-delay=0x0 Terminator: type=0, len=0 Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Packet: PACKET.Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33.send. size=110, subtype=1, version=1 Actor: type=1, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=e8f7-24b9-40d3, key=0x1, pri=0x8000, port-index=0x21, state=0x5 Partner: type=2, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=0011-5dbe-3000, key=0xe, pri=0x8000, port-index=0x104, state=0x9 Collector: type=3, len=16, col-max-delay=0x0 Terminator: type=0, len=0 Jan 19 02:31:52 2017 hp5700 %%10LLDP/6/LLDP_DELETE_NEIGHBOR: Nearest bridge agent neighbor deleted on Port Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 (IfIndex 33), Chassis ID is 0011-5dbe-3000, Port ID is Te1/3. Jan 19 02:31:54 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/34 FSM.RX CURRENT-- Jan 19 02:31:54 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Packet: -Slot=2; PACKET.Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/34.receive. size=110, subtype=1, version=1 Actor: type=1, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=4431-92d6-82de, key=0x11, pri=0x8000, port-index=0x36, state=0x3d Partner: type=2, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=e8f7-24b9-40d3, key=0x6, pri=0x8000, port-index=0xef, state=0x3d Collector: type=3, len=16, col-max-delay=0x0 Terminator: type=0, len=0 Jan 19 02:31:56 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/35 FSM.RX CURRENT-- Jan 19 02:31:56 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Packet: -Slot=2; PACKET.Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/35.receive. size=110, subtype=1, version=1 Actor: type=1, len=20, sys-pri=0x1, sys-mac=02a0-9895-db05, key=0x1, pri=0x0, port-index=0x2, state=0x3d Partner: type=2, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=e8f7-24b9-40d3, key=0x2, pri=0x8000, port-index=0xf0, state=0x3d Collector: type=3, len=16, col-max-delay=0x64 Terminator: type=0, len=0 Jan 19 02:31:57 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 FSM.PTX PERIODIC_TX-- Jan 19 02:31:57 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/33 FSM.PTX SLOW_PERIODIC-- Jan 19 02:31:57 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/35 FSM.RX CURRENT-- Jan 19 02:31:57 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Packet: PACKET.Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/35.receive. size=110, subtype=1, version=1 Actor: type=1, len=20, sys-pri=0x1, sys-mac=02a0-9895-db05, key=0x1, pri=0x0, port-index=0x1, state=0x3d Partner: type=2, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=e8f7-24b9-40d3, key=0x2, pri=0x8000, port-index=0x23, state=0x3d Collector: type=3, len=16, col-max-delay=0x64 Terminator: type=0, len=0 Jan 19 02:31:58 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/34 FSM.PTX PERIODIC_TX-- Jan 19 02:31:58 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/34 FSM.PTX SLOW_PERIODIC-- Jan 19 02:31:58 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: -Slot=2; Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/37 FSM.RX CURRENT-- Jan 19 02:31:58 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Packet: -Slot=2; PACKET.Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/34.send. size=110, subtype=1, version=1 Actor: type=1, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=e8f7-24b9-40d3, key=0x6, pri=0x8000, port-index=0xef, state=0x3d Partner: type=2, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=4431-92d6-82de, key=0x11, pri=0x8000, port-index=0x36, state=0x3d Collector: type=3, len=16, col-max-delay=0x0 Terminator: type=0, len=0 Jan 19 02:31:58 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Packet: -Slot=2; PACKET.Ten-GigabitEthernet2/0/37.receive. size=110, subtype=1, version=1 Actor: type=1, len=20, sys-pri=0x1, sys-mac=02a0-9895-daaf, key=0x1, pri=0x0, port-index=0x2, state=0x3d Partner: type=2, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=e8f7-24b9-40d3, key=0x4, pri=0x8000, port-index=0xf2, state=0x3d Collector: type=3, len=16, col-max-delay=0x64 Terminator: type=0, len=0 Jan 19 02:31:59 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Fsm: Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/37 FSM.RX CURRENT-- Jan 19 02:31:59 2017 hp5700 %%10LAGG/7/Packet: PACKET.Ten-GigabitEthernet1/0/37.receive. size=110, subtype=1, version=1 Actor: type=1, len=20, sys-pri=0x1, sys-mac=02a0-9895-daaf, key=0x1, pri=0x0, port-index=0x1, state=0x3d Partner: type=2, len=20, sys-pri=0x8000, sys-mac=e8f7-24b9-40d3, key=0x4, pri=0x8000, port-index=0x25, state=0x3d Collector: type=3, len=16, col-max-delay=0x64 Terminator: type=0, len=0
Logs for the Cisco 6500:
Jan 19 02:31:50 cisco6500 22027920: Jan 19 02:31:48.873 CET: SP: RSTP(1010): starting topology change timer for 35 seconds Jan 19 02:31:52 cisco6500 22027942: Jan 19 02:31:51.487 CET: SP: LACP: Jan 19 02:31:52 cisco6500 22027951: Jan 19 02:31:52.307 CET: SP: LACP: Jan 19 02:31:52 cisco6500 22027952: Jan 19 02:31:52.437 CET: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet1/3, changed state to down Jan 19 02:31:52 cisco6500 22027953: Jan 19 02:31:52.437 CET: FEC: pagp_switch_is_in_port_channel: Te1/3 is part of agport Jan 19 02:31:52 cisco6500 22027954: Jan 19 02:31:52.481 CET: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet3/3, changed state to down Jan 19 02:31:52 cisco6500 22027955: Jan 19 02:31:52.481 CET: FEC: pagp_switch_is_in_port_channel: Te3/3 is part of agport Jan 19 02:31:52 cisco6500 22027957: Jan 19 02:31:52.489 CET: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface TenGigabitEthernet1/3, changed state to down Jan 19 02:31:52 cisco6500 22027958: Jan 19 02:31:52.517 CET: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Port-channel14, changed state to down Jan 19 02:31:52 cisco6500 22027959: Jan 19 02:31:52.517 CET: FEC: pagp_switch_is_in_port_channel: Po14 is not part of any agport Jan 19 02:31:52 cisco6500 22027960: Jan 19 02:31:52.525 CET: FEC: pagp_switch_portlist_in_channelgroup: Te1/3 part of group 14 Jan 19 02:31:52 cisco6500 22027961: Jan 19 02:31:52.525 CET: FEC: pagp_switch_portlist_in_channelgroup: Te3/3 part of group 14 Jan 19 02:31:52 cisco6500 22027962: Jan 19 02:31:52.525 CET: FEC: pagp_switch_portlist_in_channelgroup: Te3/3 part of group 14 Jan 19 02:31:53 cisco6500 22027963: Jan 19 02:31:52.537 CET: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Port-channel14, changed state to down Jan 19 02:31:53 cisco6500 22027964: Jan 19 02:31:52.541 CET: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface TenGigabitEthernet3/3, changed state to down Jan 19 02:31:54 cisco6500 22027965: Jan 19 02:31:52.713 CET: %PM-SPSTBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: channel-misconfig error detected on Te1/3, putting Te1/3 in err-disable state Jan 19 02:31:54 cisco6500 22027966: Jan 19 02:31:52.737 CET: %PM-SPSTBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: channel-misconfig error detected on Te3/3, putting Te3/3 in err-disable state Jan 19 02:31:54 cisco6500 22027967: Jan 19 02:31:53.157 CET: %PM-SPSTBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: channel-misconfig error detected on Po14, putting Te1/3 in err-disable state Jan 19 02:31:54 cisco6500 22027968: Jan 19 02:31:53.157 CET: %PM-SPSTBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: channel-misconfig error detected on Po14, putting Te3/3 in err-disable state Jan 19 02:31:54 cisco6500 22027969: Jan 19 02:31:53.157 CET: %PM-SPSTBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: channel-misconfig error detected on Po14, putting Po14 in err-disable state Jan 19 02:31:54 cisco6500 22027973: Jan 19 02:31:52.431 CET: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: channel-misconfig error detected on Po14, putting Te1/3 in err-disable state Jan 19 02:31:54 cisco6500 22027975: Jan 19 02:31:52.475 CET: SP: LACP: if_down: Te1/3 Jan 19 02:31:54 cisco6500 22027980: Jan 19 02:31:52.475 CET: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: channel-misconfig error detected on Po14, putting Te3/3 in err-disable state Jan 19 02:31:54 cisco6500 22027982: Jan 19 02:31:52.527 CET: SP: LACP: if_down: Te3/3 Jan 19 02:31:54 cisco6500 22027987: Jan 19 02:31:52.527 CET: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: channel-misconfig error detected on Po14, putting Po14 in err-disable state Jan 19 02:31:54 cisco6500 22027988: Jan 19 02:31:52.759 CET: %LINEPROTO-SP-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet1/3, changed state to down Jan 19 02:31:54 cisco6500 22027989: Jan 19 02:31:52.759 CET: %LINEPROTO-SP-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet3/3, changed state to down Jan 19 02:31:54 cisco6500 22027990: Jan 19 02:31:52.759 CET: %LINK-SP-3-UPDOWN: Interface TenGigabitEthernet1/3, changed state to down Jan 19 02:31:54 cisco6500 22027991: Jan 19 02:31:52.759 CET: %LINEPROTO-SP-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Port-channel14, changed state to down Jan 19 02:31:54 cisco6500 22027992: Jan 19 02:31:52.759 CET: %LINK-SP-3-UPDOWN: Interface Port-channel14, changed state to down Jan 19 02:31:54 cisco6500 22027993: Jan 19 02:31:52.759 CET: %LINK-SP-3-UPDOWN: Interface TenGigabitEthernet3/3, changed state to down Jan 19 02:31:57 cisco6500 22028027: Jan 19 02:31:56.961 CET: SP: LACP:
Thanks for your advices
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-19-2017 05:40 AM
тАО01-19-2017 05:40 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
network topology
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-19-2017 05:55 AM
тАО01-19-2017 05:55 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
so now need to debug LACP packets during event i think
do you have log from switch where Server is connected ?
JY
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-19-2017 06:18 AM
тАО01-19-2017 06:18 AM
Re: LACP randomly fail between hpe5700 and cisco 6509
also there a know issue on Blade switch with LACP dont' know is relevant in your case
ymptom:
LACP packets received from downstream port-channel members are flooded by the 3120 switch instead of being processed.
Conditions:
Issue seen on CBS3120 switch running 12.2(40)EX1
Workaround:
Instead of LACP please use a "mode on" for bundling the member links.