- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE 3PAR StoreServ Storage
- >
- Re: Thick vs Thin 3PAR 7450c and vSphere 5.1 Build...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-30-2015 10:51 AM
тАО06-30-2015 10:51 AM
Hello,
I know this is tricky talk about thin and thick storage within vSphere.
Through my research I have done. The 3PAR storage creates its volumes as Thin to manage space. Which makes sense.
So, now if i create a VM within VMware with thick drives, do i gain something ? I should gain performance, right ?
What about thin ?
Or, the fact that 3PAR creates its volumes as thin, having a VM with thick vmdk's will not make any difference ?
Thanks for your help,
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-30-2015 10:57 AM - last edited on тАО05-18-2021 05:54 AM by Ramya_Heera
тАО06-30-2015 10:57 AM - last edited on тАО05-18-2021 05:54 AM by Ramya_Heera
SolutionTake a look at the Technical paper HP 3PAR StoreServ Storage and VMware vSphere 5 best practices
Search Google for 4AA4-3286ENW
There's a good section on "HP 3PAR Thin Provisioning vs. vSphere Thin Provisioning".
Note: While I work for HP, all of my comments (whether noted or not), are my own and are not any official representation of the company.
----------
If my post was useful, click on my KUDOS! thumb below!
Note: While I am an HPE Employee, all of my comments (whether noted or not), are my own and are not any official representation of the company
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-30-2015 11:16 AM
тАО06-30-2015 11:16 AM
Re: Thick vs Thin 3PAR 7450c and vSphere 5.1 Build 2323236
Sweet, so on Page 29..
"....utilizing host-side thin provisioning reduces the underlying volume performance while at the same time incurring additional ESXi host overhead."
I am assuming host-side is the VMware side, right ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-30-2015 11:27 AM
тАО06-30-2015 11:27 AM
Re: Thick vs Thin 3PAR 7450c and vSphere 5.1 Build 2323236
Yes. Host-side is VMware side.
Note: While I am an HPE Employee, all of my comments (whether noted or not), are my own and are not any official representation of the company