- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- HPE Aruba Networking & ProVision-based
- >
- QoS for PCoIP, does this look right?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-19-2014 10:30 AM - last edited on 02-23-2014 08:00 PM by Lisa198503
02-19-2014 10:30 AM - last edited on 02-23-2014 08:00 PM by Lisa198503
QoS for PCoIP, does this look right?
Hi, I am configuring a switch for our infrastructure to replace an older switch with no QoS capabilities. We are running VMware View, using the PCoIP protocol which runs on port 4172 (TCP and UDP). I would like to ensure that this traffic is prioritized at the highest level at all times above all other traffic. Can anyone have a look at this config file for the switch I'm planning to implement and tell me if this looks correct?
Thanks.
See below, I've pasted the config, and removed everything except the QoS stuff. By the way, this is a 2910al-48G switch.
hostname "Switch 1"
time timezone -360
no qos dscp-map 000000
no qos dscp-map 001000
no qos dscp-map 001010
no qos dscp-map 001100
no qos dscp-map 001110
no qos dscp-map 010000
no qos dscp-map 010010
no qos dscp-map 010100
no qos dscp-map 010110
no qos dscp-map 011000
no qos dscp-map 011010
no qos dscp-map 011100
no qos dscp-map 011110
no qos dscp-map 100000
qos dscp-map 100010 priority 7
no qos dscp-map 100100
no qos dscp-map 100110
no qos dscp-map 101000
no qos dscp-map 101110
no qos dscp-map 110000
no qos dscp-map 111000
module 1 type J9148A
qos type-of-service diff-services
qos type-of-service diff-services 100010 dscp 100010
qos udp-port 4172 dscp 100010
qos tcp-port 4172 dscp 100010
no autorun
password manager
P.S. This thread has been moved from Switches, Hubs, Modems (Legacy ITRC forum) to ProCurve / ProVision-Based. -HP Forum Moderator
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-25-2014 08:47 AM
02-25-2014 08:47 AM
Re: QoS for PCoIP, does this look right?
That should work fine, but you shouldn't need to have...
qos type-of-service diff-services 100010 dscp 100010
This is just re-assigning one DSCP codepoint to another, so with your config you are just re-assigning 100010 to 100010, thus probably adding a unnessary overhead on your CPU.
Don't forget to mark a post resolved if your question was answered.