- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- Re: CA - failover/failback
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-15-2006 09:04 AM
тАО08-15-2006 09:04 AM
CA - failover/failback
Qn 1: The luns presented to the hosts at the DR site should be in read-only mode (or read-write ?) mode before the fail over occurs?. If read-only, do I have to change the mode manually to read-write post failover ?
Also what happens after the failback process ? Will it start replicating the whole data or only the changed blocks back till the point both are in sync so as to failback to source?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-15-2006 11:48 AM
тАО08-15-2006 11:48 AM
Re: CA - failover/failback
I'm not sure on your second set of questions, but as I understand it, if the failover was for a relatively short duration, failback will not have recopy all the blocks...only what has changed.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-16-2006 01:33 AM
тАО08-16-2006 01:33 AM
Re: CA - failover/failback
When you perform the failover, data is continuously replicated, now from the destination to the source (of course, roles change now and you cannot think as destination anymore). No full replication required.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-16-2006 04:22 AM
тАО08-16-2006 04:22 AM
Re: CA - failover/failback
> read only mode until you perform the failover.
But that is not the default, is it?
If you configure the system that way, at least Windows will see duplicate devices!
The normal setup is that the presentation is set up on the target Vdisks, but mapping to the host's LUN addresses happens as part of the failover.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-16-2006 06:10 AM
тАО08-16-2006 06:10 AM
Re: CA - failover/failback
This can be usefull for backup porposes, etc.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-16-2006 08:01 AM
тАО08-16-2006 08:01 AM
Re: CA - failover/failback
>But that is not the default, is it?
Yes, it it's like that by default (At least on my systems)
> If you configure the system that way, at least Windows will see duplicate devices!
No, presentation is not enabled until you perform the failover.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-16-2006 08:17 PM
тАО08-16-2006 08:17 PM
Re: CA - failover/failback
we can set up presentation on the target Vdisks, but the disk is not mapped to the host unless a failover is made.
I would not call this a 'readonly mode', because it is confusing.
Making a target Vdisk available to a host in readonly mode for BACKUP (I, too thought that is only on the roadmap, yet) is only good, if you make _very_ sure that the replication has been suspended - else, the backup host will experience unexpected file system changes (similar to what we see every few days here when somebody want to share a file system between two servers, with an operating system that does not know how to do that ;-)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-17-2006 02:18 AM
тАО08-17-2006 02:18 AM
Re: CA - failover/failback
> we can set up presentation on the target Vdisks, but the disk is not mapped to the host unless a failover is made.
I would not call this a 'readonly mode', because it is confusing.
That is correct, The host cannot access the virtual disk, but if you check the Copy Sets in command view, you will see the disks market as "read only". That was what I mean.
> Making a target Vdisk available to a host in readonly mode for BACKUP (I, too thought that is only on the roadmap, yet) is only good, if you make _very_ sure that the replication has been suspended - else, the backup host will experience unexpected file system changes (similar to what we see every few days here when somebody want to share a file system between two servers, with an operating system that does not know how to do that ;-)
I think that you cannot present the disk to other host while is replicating.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-17-2006 04:18 AM
тАО08-17-2006 04:18 AM
Re: CA - failover/failback
> you will see the disks market as "read only".
> That was what I mean.
OK, I have assumed so, but don't have a CA setup handy to check. I don't blame you, but it is still confusing like the disk group's so-called "protection level".
> I think that you cannot present the disk to other host while is replicating.
Not today, right. But as I and Basil wrote, it is supposed to be on a roadmap. We'll see...