- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- FC SAN interoperability
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-29-2001 08:01 AM
05-29-2001 08:01 AM
(158223-B21 ). For more information: (http://www.compaq.com/products/storageworks/Hubs-and-Bridges/fcs8s16qs.html)
I want to configure a FC-AL with N,L,K,and R class servers sharing some FC10 Disk System and HP FC hubs 10port (A3724A) short wave.
Can anyone tell me if will be possible to connect the Compaq switch with the HP FC-AL structure using HP 10port Hubs without any problem?
Some practical experience?
Some web recources?
Thank you,
florin
I attached here a visio graphics.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-30-2001 11:41 PM
05-30-2001 11:41 PM
SolutionI see what you are doing but I beleieve you will run into limitations. if this where to be an all HP config, it would not be allowed to have multiple hosts via one hub to a FC switch since the hosts would not be able to talk 24-bit addressing but only 8 bit. Another thing to bear in mind are LIP's and their effect on the stabillity of the configuration in general.
I would give the hosts their own connection to the FC switch (it is a Brocade switch).
There is not a lot of documentation on this. mainly because Compaq tests with their own hardware and HP tests with their own products as well. I would check with Compaq to hear if they have tested HP9000 systems in their SAN configurations.
hope this helps,
Cal.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-31-2001 01:54 AM
05-31-2001 01:54 AM
Re: FC SAN interoperability
we use a similar environment, but be bought our brocades directly from HP.
Take a look at the firmware of the switches, if you have a new one (either 2.2.x or 2.4.x) you can define different Aribrated Loops on one Switch.
That might give you an advantage with fault tolerance, data path, splitting, etc.
If possible, you should consider to use fabric connects, at least for your N and L classes.
Fabric connects are, once established, easier to handle, more fault tolerant, ...
Although the connect trough HUBs should work, I agree with Caliban that it is not a good idea.
hope, i could help
bernd
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-12-2001 04:48 AM
06-12-2001 04:48 AM
Re: FC SAN interoperability
Sorry about I does not mention on my first message that the Compaq switch will be configured into a separate SAN (and it is already installed!).
We plan to build a separated SAN using HP equipment, too. We will start with some FC10 disk arrays. After this we want to be able to interconnect both switches (Compaq and HP).
Regarding the possible actual limitation (very well pointed by you) we decided to use switches (Brocade 8 port - A5625A) but my question is still on top: Does anyone encounter some experience with interconnection between different vendors FC equipment (switches in my case) such as: HP, Brocade, QLogic or Compaq?
Assuming that information included in hereunder attached "pdf" file is correct (could not be? :-)) I could compared the Compaq switch with a Brocade Silkworm 2800Fibre Channel Switch (A5624A). It looks to have similar characteristics. What I am still looking for it is a practical experience with these two switches. Are they fully compatible? It is specified that I could connect without problems the Compaq switch with a HP 9000 server using the QuickLoop FCAL emulation software. But with HP switch?
During my search, I have found an interesting site that could be useful for other question regarding SAN interoperability (http://www.snia.org/).
Thank you again,
Florin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2001 03:02 AM
06-13-2001 03:02 AM
Re: FC SAN interoperability
This could cause some problems.
Other than that, Quickloop takes some care in configuring with other topologies, such as Fabric Login. If you're doing everything Fabric Login, you will have less trouble. This requires 10.20 or above, the newer FC HBA in your HPUX servers, and the latest patch levels for the FC HBAs.
Good Luck
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2001 04:55 AM
06-13-2001 04:55 AM
Re: FC SAN interoperability
In our environment, we have connected different OS/(HBA)'s (WinNT/QLogic,SUN/??,AIX/??,HPUX/Tachyon) trough the same switches. That runs without any problems, as long as you define different Zones for each OS.
We don't have different switches connected together, but this should not cause problems, too.
Recently, we updated a StorageTek switch with a firmware (a2.4.1) from HP - that worked perfectly, too.
So I think they really are the same, only different Labels.
Bernd
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-24-2001 06:16 AM
07-24-2001 06:16 AM