GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- Re: Load balancing on Continuous Access
HPE EVA Storage
1844561
Members
3069
Online
110233
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-25-2007 10:23 PM
01-25-2007 10:23 PM
I have a 2 Fabric SAN, each Fabric connects via a pair of MP400s to a remote SAN, with an EVA at each site.
One thing I noticed when setting up was that the first Fabric configured did not allow the Management Appliance at the local site to see the remote EVA. It was only when I configured the second Fabric that this was possible.
Now I am replicating across the link, traffic is only going across the second Fabric.
Question: Should the CA product auto load-balance traffic across Fabrics? Is there an option I missed on the setup (Both were configured using the same commandsets)?
Should I disable the second fabric and see if the first gets used?
Share and Enjoy! Ian
PS. The Fabric OS documentation for the MP400s is a steaming pile of guano; wrong Fabric OS, wrong commands, wrong dependencies. I will sanitise my own instructions and upload them later.
One thing I noticed when setting up was that the first Fabric configured did not allow the Management Appliance at the local site to see the remote EVA. It was only when I configured the second Fabric that this was possible.
Now I am replicating across the link, traffic is only going across the second Fabric.
Question: Should the CA product auto load-balance traffic across Fabrics? Is there an option I missed on the setup (Both were configured using the same commandsets)?
Should I disable the second fabric and see if the first gets used?
Share and Enjoy! Ian
PS. The Fabric OS documentation for the MP400s is a steaming pile of guano; wrong Fabric OS, wrong commands, wrong dependencies. I will sanitise my own instructions and upload them later.
Building a dumber user
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-25-2007 10:31 PM
01-25-2007 10:31 PM
Re: Load balancing on Continuous Access
Clarification: It is the MP Router XPath 7.4 manual which is irrelevant, however it is the only document I found that contains the combination of both the theory planning and implementation steps (albiet with wrong commands) to implement FCIP Tunnels.
Share and Enjoy indeed! Ian
Share and Enjoy indeed! Ian
Building a dumber user
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-25-2007 11:59 PM
01-25-2007 11:59 PM
Solution
CA EVA uses a very efficient replication protocol that only takes one roundtrip per data exchange.
In order to ensure consistency traffic for a single DR group can only use one path. This path is called a tunnnel.
So, if you create just one DR group you can only replicate through one tunnel and thus one fabric.
However in case of a failure the EVAs can rebuild the tunnel over any controller and fabric!
As you know all Vdisks in a DR group are owned by one controller.
So for an example EVA1-CtrlA owns all Vdisks of the source DR group while EVA2-CtrlA or CtrlB may own the Vdisks of the destination DR group.
This also means that if you create 4+ DR groups you can have 4 tunnels and utilizing all 4 controllers and both fabrics.
See my attached drawing where I show the relationship between DR groups and tunnels.
Cheers
Peter
In order to ensure consistency traffic for a single DR group can only use one path. This path is called a tunnnel.
So, if you create just one DR group you can only replicate through one tunnel and thus one fabric.
However in case of a failure the EVAs can rebuild the tunnel over any controller and fabric!
As you know all Vdisks in a DR group are owned by one controller.
So for an example EVA1-CtrlA owns all Vdisks of the source DR group while EVA2-CtrlA or CtrlB may own the Vdisks of the destination DR group.
This also means that if you create 4+ DR groups you can have 4 tunnels and utilizing all 4 controllers and both fabrics.
See my attached drawing where I show the relationship between DR groups and tunnels.
Cheers
Peter
I love storage
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-26-2007 12:46 AM
01-26-2007 12:46 AM
Re: Load balancing on Continuous Access
Peter,
Thank you for the input. I have already set up "tunnels" for the FCIP connection between routers, so are you describing another "tunnel" that exists at a higher level (or Layer for the CCNAs in the audience) that is controlled by the EVAs?
If so, how do I control (directly or indirectly) which controller is used?
Share and Enjoy! Ian
Attached is an instruction document I created for establishing FCIP Tunnels which may be useful. I did this on a clean-site so use with care on existing sites. All WWNs and Device Names anonymised.
Thank you for the input. I have already set up "tunnels" for the FCIP connection between routers, so are you describing another "tunnel" that exists at a higher level (or Layer for the CCNAs in the audience) that is controlled by the EVAs?
If so, how do I control (directly or indirectly) which controller is used?
Share and Enjoy! Ian
Attached is an instruction document I created for establishing FCIP Tunnels which may be useful. I did this on a clean-site so use with care on existing sites. All WWNs and Device Names anonymised.
Building a dumber user
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP