- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- Microsoft clusters and physical disk settings in a...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-12-2007 01:48 AM
08-12-2007 01:48 AM
I am scraping for parameters to have our MS clusters be more forgiving in our SAN.
Currently if you sneeze on one of our EVA's, you could see an automatic failover (works great, but is too sensitive to SAN perturbations) on one of our clusters (R2|x64|SP2).
Perhaps these two parameters are not related to my issue. Are there other timeouts that you have specifically adjusted to have your windows clusters behave more forgiving-like-unix on a SAN? Our HBA disk timeouts are set to 2minutes. IsAlive is the default 60seconds, and LooksAlive is 5seconds.
Yesterday I pulled (after "remove") a bad (already ungrouped drive) and it triggered a failover event...
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-12-2007 01:51 AM
08-12-2007 01:51 AM
Re: Microsoft clusters and physical disk settings in a SAN
Also, our switches have been reviewed and no issues pop-out.
Also, latest and greatest VCS.
Also, no outstanding errors in controller logs.
Also, not using load balancing with MPIO, but manually setting default path to managing controller.
thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-12-2007 07:54 AM
08-12-2007 07:54 AM
Re: Microsoft clusters and physical disk settings in a SAN
Watch out - command lines might wrap.
> reg query "HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Disk" /v TimeOutValue
> reg add HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Disk /v TimeOutValue /t REG_DWORD /d 60
A reboot is required...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-12-2007 08:18 AM
08-12-2007 08:18 AM
Re: Microsoft clusters and physical disk settings in a SAN
We also set that 360 setting that is in the release notes for VCS 4.04/07+.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-12-2007 08:23 PM
08-12-2007 08:23 PM
Solutionwhat is the System event log saying at failover time? And have you looked at %SystemRoot%\Cluster\cluster.log (on the node that "lost" the disk) for any clues (maybe you can post those two informations so we can take a look - including with a timestamp of a failover)?
Are you using storport or scsiport driver model?
Is it always the same disk that causes the failover (if there is more than one clustered disk) or is it random?
What you might try is letting your physical disk resource(s) run in a seperate resource monitor (configurable checkbox on the physical disk's property page), which prevents "hanging" checks on other cluster resources (e.g. lots of file shares, third party cluster resources) to influence the check. Unfortunately you have to take the physical disk resource offline and bring it back online once for this change to take effect!
If you use storport drivers you might want to upgrade to the latest version in KB935561 (http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;935561).
Also check out KB912593 and KB923424, but since we're still on SP1 I don't know whether they're still needed on SP2 machines.
Urban
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-12-2007 08:25 PM
08-12-2007 08:25 PM
Re: Microsoft clusters and physical disk settings in a SAN
what is the System event log saying at failover time? And have you looked at %SystemRoot%\Cluster\cluster.log (on the node that "lost" the disk) for any clues (maybe you can post those two informations so we can take a look - including with a timestamp of a failover)?
Are you using storport or scsiport driver model?
Is it always the same disk that causes the failover (if there is more than one clustered disk) or is it random?
What you might try is letting your physical disk resource(s) run in a separate resource monitor (configurable checkbox on the physical disk's property page), which prevents "hanging" checks on other cluster resources (e.g. lots of file shares, third party cluster resources) to influence the check. Unfortunately you have to take the physical disk resource offline and bring it back online once for this change to take effect!
If you use storport drivers you might want to upgrade to the latest version in KB935561 (http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;935561).
Also check out KB912593 and KB923424, but since we're still on SP1 I don't know whether they're still needed on SP2 machines.
Urban