- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- Offset (64)
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-04-2007 07:01 PM
02-04-2007 07:01 PM
Offset (64)
EVA 3K & EVA 4K in the past we've always set the offset allignment to 64 but since we've introduced a wast usage of ESX it seems that vmware do have a different approach to the usage of partition allignment same goes for MS SQL and Exchange. Can anyone pls. send comments also in reference to the loss of performance...how much is really lost in performance for not following the guidelines!?!
best reg,
-Claus Bohm-
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-05-2007 04:30 PM
02-05-2007 04:30 PM
Re: Offset (64)
VMware recommends that you align virtual Windows disks using diskpar.exe, just like you used to.
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/esx3_partition_align.pdf
Ole Thomsen
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-05-2007 04:34 PM
02-05-2007 04:34 PM
Re: Offset (64)
"The performance degradation of unaligned partition occurs during intensive I/O
workloads rather than on those with low to moderate I/O activity."
Ole Thomsen
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-05-2007 08:13 PM
02-05-2007 08:13 PM
Re: Offset (64)
http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1036242
Hope this helps.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-08-2007 05:30 AM
02-08-2007 05:30 AM
Re: Offset (64)
Just to add to the confusion of this 64 offset issue for the MBR. I defined the 64 offset using diskpart on a Windows 2003 SP1 server, running off a EVA5000 running VCS 3.028, and then went to format the disk, and was unable to do so! I deleted the defined disk, and recreated a default disk partition, and was then able to format the disk as normal.
I'm reasonably confident that we were not making a mistake with the diskpart command. But the results meant that it was impossible to create a disk on a disk defined with the offset, so we didn't and haven't used the offset and everything has been running fine for exchange, sql, and file servers attached to this san.
For ESX, I personally wouldn't worry about defining the offset.
Hope this of use.
Regards
Owen
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-12-2007 01:04 AM
08-12-2007 01:04 AM
Re: Offset (64)
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/929491