- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- Re: Which Evaperf counter ?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-10-2008 01:41 AM
тАО06-10-2008 01:41 AM
i guess to have some I/O performance problem on EVA4000, so i would like to use evaperf for identify possible bottleneck.
I've read Evaperf paper but i don't understand wich (windows) performance counter can i add for my aim.
Someone can tell me some tips or advice?
thanks very much
Andrea
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-10-2008 02:49 AM
тАО06-10-2008 02:49 AM
Re: Which Evaperf counter ?
first of all the Load balancing should be checked: Do you use the ALB or SLB?
ALB=MultipathIO (DSM 2.X, 3.X) on the hosts with (SQST LB setting) and the EVA Set preferred path = NONE - this is recommended as the optimum for most windows apps i the Active/Active EVA.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-10-2008 04:57 AM
тАО06-10-2008 04:57 AM
Re: Which Evaperf counter ?
I've seen command view but i don't find it.
thanks very much
Andrea
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-10-2008 04:59 AM
тАО06-10-2008 04:59 AM
Re: Which Evaperf counter ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-10-2008 05:06 AM
тАО06-10-2008 05:06 AM
Re: Which Evaperf counter ?
OS unit ID: 0
Preferred path/mode: No Preference
Managing controller: Controller A
SCSI Reservation : None
All vdisks are in RAID5, but no other relevant informations in presentation of VDISK
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-10-2008 06:05 AM
тАО06-10-2008 06:05 AM
Re: Which Evaperf counter ?
and are you using the MPIO load balancing pls? If not, then the host<->eva communication is not balanced which means that the whole communication can go only via one controller.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-10-2008 07:00 AM
тАО06-10-2008 07:00 AM
Re: Which Evaperf counter ?
I've seen all Command View configuration but it doesn't.
thanks again
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-10-2008 07:21 AM
тАО06-10-2008 07:21 AM
Re: Which Evaperf counter ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-12-2008 07:56 AM
тАО06-12-2008 07:56 AM
Re: Which Evaperf counter ?
However, you can tell me which data i have to verify with Evaperf for identify possible performance poor?
thanks!
Andrew
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-12-2008 09:35 AM
тАО06-12-2008 09:35 AM
Solution1. the basic Performance metrics:
array stats (evaperf as)
controller stats (evaperf cs) -
host port stats (evaperf hps) - IO latency
physical disk group stats (evaperf pdg)
you can run this 4 in a separate CMD windows and you can see the overview of the perf situation
(combine it with the -csv operand to import the data to e.g. any perf grapher or excell itself)
2. then according to the bad host port statistics you can run specific
vdisks performance data evaperf vd -fvd
The key performance parameter:
1. IO latency
values:
a) read miss latency
<10ms =ecxellent
10<20ms =very good
20<30ms =acceptable
30ms and more =unacceptable
b) write latency
<5ms (with write cache enabled) =ok
5ms and more =unacceptable,
we need to check the physical disks IO request queuing (evaperf pd, pdg)
>1.5-2 queue depthts - not enough spindles in a disk group (add more physical disks)
2. Host queue depth (hc)= io requests at a time
example: the default queue depth per host HBA for the windows server is 32. If the actual values are less then potential workload, then we can say that the host is not giving the array enough work to do. If it is equal/similar, the HBA server side queue depth settings should be tuned
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-13-2008 01:02 AM
тАО06-13-2008 01:02 AM
Re: Which Evaperf counter ?
When finished (almost 2 days of monitoring) i would like that you can see the results
:)
So, now my EVA storage is this:
Disk Group 500Gb (n.12 disks)
Disk Group 300Gb/10k (30 disks)
Disk Group 300Gb/15k (8 disks)
thanks!
Andrew
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-18-2008 02:54 AM
тАО06-18-2008 02:54 AM
Re: Which Evaperf counter ?
i export data of the first day from evaperf to csv and i see that in PDiskGroup of 500Gb there are many high values:
DriveQueueDepth has reached 38
WriteLatency(us) Max:515255 Avg:29081
For DiskGroup od 300Gb instead:
DriveQueueDepth has reached 10
WriteLatency(us) Max:285609 Avg:16248
I don't know what does it mean "us" in WriteLatency, but i quess queue is very high..
Which are your tips/advices in this case?
thanks again
Andrew
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-18-2008 09:30 AM
тАО06-18-2008 09:30 AM
Re: Which Evaperf counter ?
the queue depth is the number of active I/O or SCSI command descriptor blocks, that can be handled by the SCSI and/or HBA layer at the same time. The good approach is to set the queue length as similar as possible to the number of the physical drives in the disk group:
The qlogic HBAs default is 16,
1. so you can try the value of 32.
it is worth remembering that for a busy Windows server with a small number of large LUNs, it would be normal to have a queue depth of 64 or more.
2. at the same time you can try to distribute the load via the MPIO DSM Loadbalancing (SQST mode)to balance the load across all 4 EVA frontports (FPs).
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-19-2008 08:15 AM
тАО06-19-2008 08:15 AM
Re: Which Evaperf counter ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-19-2008 08:24 AM
тАО06-19-2008 08:24 AM
Re: Which Evaperf counter ?
yes the eva 4000/4100 and 6000/6100 have 4 FC front (host) ports