- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- IMC
- >
- Re: Distributed IMC implementation options
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-19-2012 12:13 AM
05-19-2012 12:13 AM
Distributed IMC implementation options
Hi all,
I've been through a single IMC Enterprise setup and config and all went ok as expected. It's a great platform with lots of useful functionalities able to cover a multivendor network.
Right now I'm trying to test a distributed IMC implementation where I would like to have two management servers for the same distributed network, for redundancy purposes, as if a server is unavailable at one site, I can always use the other.
I've been reading through the documentation, and there seems to be available only a limited deployment mode, where the Master contains some modules and the Slaves contains some another modules, that can't be present in the Master. It's kind of a deception that I can't seem to run the same module on more than one server, as I was able to verify on my tests.
So what are my options? Should I just implement two independent servers managing the same end devices? What about devices and config template consistency across two platforms?
Any help/recommendation/design tip is welcomed, as I'm probably missing something here... I was expecting more from a "Highly flexible, scalable deployment models" platform.
Thanks in advance,
David Galveias
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-23-2012 11:19 PM
05-23-2012 11:19 PM
Re: Distributed IMC implementation options
Hi
I think you confuse Distributed with HA. For HA, you build 2 iMC servers so when one server has problems, you can use another.
For Distributed, you use several servers to deploy different IMC modules, but all servers work as a single IMC system.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-04-2013 06:13 AM
09-04-2013 06:13 AM
Re: Distributed IMC implementation options
Hi Guys!
I have a similar question. I manage a network with about 150 devices (switches and APs) and I run IMC Std. 5.2 on a Linux box with MySql. How can I implement IMC redundancy ? Would I need another server with IMC and a new data base? Or they can share the same Mysql data base?
Regards
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-04-2013 02:02 PM
09-04-2013 02:02 PM
Re: Distributed IMC implementation options
That would be 2 totally separte installs (with separate DB, since you want failover including a possible DB failure).
Base principle is to use the backup on the primary server to a shared path, and run an automated(scheduled) restore on the secondary. This will keep the DBs "kind of" in sync.
All devices should be configured to send traps to both IPs.
Hope this helps,Peter.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-08-2014 05:18 AM
10-08-2014 05:18 AM
Re: Distributed IMC implementation options
So basically you fill both the Active and Standby environment with syslog and snmp traps and the backup/restore keeps the installations in sync ?