- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- LAN Routing
- >
- Re: Static LAG with switch from another brand
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-06-2019 10:13 AM - edited 05-06-2019 11:43 AM
05-06-2019 10:13 AM - edited 05-06-2019 11:43 AM
Static LAG with switch from another brand
Hello.
I know that this question is a stretch, but if someone could drop a hint I would be very grateful.
I have two managed switches, one is a Procruve J9028B (1800-24G), the other is a TP-Link TL-SG1024DE.
I want to create a LAG between both but I am unsure if it can work at all.
While the TL-SG1024DE has the simple Static LAG setting page, the Procurve has other naming schemes that might mean the same thing or not, for example:
- Trunk Membership (Aggregation);
- LACP Setup;
The TL-SG1024DE switch doesn't seem to have any LACP settings, so that seems to be a dead end, but the Trunk Membership - is it possible that it achieves the same funcionality as the TP-Link's Static LAG?
On the TP-Link I've created a Static LAG (LAG 1) using ports 15 and 17, then on the Procurve I've created a Trunk Membership (Trunk T1) (Aggregation Mode: SMAC XOR DMAC) using ports 16 and 18; port 15<->16 and port 17<->18. The idea is essentially to create a 2Gbps uplink instead of a single 1Gbps uplink, I'm considering expanding it to at least 4Gbps if this works, but how can I be sure it is working?
I don't see any critical issues that should happen when there's a loop, but I also am not sure if I have the 2Gbps uplink between both switches using this configuration.
Aditionally, this is some of the statistics that I could gather from both switches, with a few seconds of delay (~5) between the HPE switch/ports and the statistics in the TP-Link ones:
Port 15 (TPL - LAG 1)
- TxGoodPkt: 2232
- TxBadPkt: 0
- RxGoodPkt: 336566
- RxBadPkt: 0
Port 16 (HPE - Trunk 1)
- Received Packets: 3163
- Received Errors: 0
- Transmitted Packets: 410757
- Transmitted Errors: 0
Port 17 (TPL - LAG 1)
- TxGoodPkt: 761773
- TxBadPkt: 0
- RxGoodPkt: 93328
- RxBadPkt: 0
Port 18 (HPE - Trunk 1)
- Received Packets: 951143
- Received Errors: 0
- Transmitted Packets: 116757
- Transmitted Errors: 0
Thanks for your comments.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-08-2019 06:48 PM
05-08-2019 06:48 PM
Re: Static LAG with switch from another brand
Hi,
I think the setup should work as Trunk in procurve is link-aggregation and you can use either static or LACP. Static is configured without LACP setup. Like you said if TP-Link have static and procurve have trunk-Member then i suppose it should work without any issues..
Thanks
-N