- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: another ntp problem
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-14-2002 05:28 PM
03-14-2002 05:28 PM
Feb 27 10:34:10 netf-pd xntpd[3895]: time reset (step) -0.245374 s
Feb 27 10:34:10 netf-pd xntpd[3895]: synchronisation lost
Feb 27 10:39:30 netf-pd xntpd[3895]: synchronized to 202.109.93.*, stratum=1
Feb 27 10:39:30 netf-pd xntpd[3895]: time reset (step) 0.236315 s
Feb 27 10:39:30 netf-pd xntpd[3895]: synchronisation lost
Feb 27 10:44:50 netf-pd xntpd[3895]: synchronized to 202.109.93.*, stratum=1
Feb 27 11:03:07 netf-pd xntpd[5982]: xntpd version=3.5f; Thu Oct 23 13:37:20 PDT 1997 (6)
Feb 27 11:03:07 netf-pd xntpd[5982]: tickadj = 625, tick = 10000, tvu_maxslew = 61875
Feb 27 11:03:07 netf-pd xntpd[5982]: precision = 9 usec
Feb 27 11:07:24 netf-pd xntpd[5982]: synchronized to 202.109.93.*, stratum=1
is there some problem :synchronisation lost?
what does the message mean?
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-14-2002 06:03 PM
03-14-2002 06:03 PM
SolutionI suspect that one of the time sources is either over a WAN or a slow(ish) network.
the man page for xntpd explains this in detail, and explains the specific messages you've been seeing.
man xntpd
nothing terribly much to worry about.
Scott.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-14-2002 06:05 PM
03-14-2002 06:05 PM
Re: another ntp problem
If this is the case, you will notice even the smallest of small incremental adjustments.
Once again, the man page describes this.
Scott.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-14-2002 06:06 PM
03-14-2002 06:06 PM
Re: another ntp problem
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-14-2002 06:13 PM
03-14-2002 06:13 PM
Re: another ntp problem
==============================================================================
*ppp54-93-109-20 .GPS. 1 u 108 256 377 6.42 1.384 1.69
something wrong?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-14-2002 08:22 PM
03-14-2002 08:22 PM
Re: another ntp problem
Is this via a modem or the network?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-14-2002 09:05 PM
03-14-2002 09:05 PM
Re: another ntp problem
it is because of slow network connction.
the delay column indicates it. and the sync. lost message is because the xntpd detected 128 mili sec. dif between the two clocks.
try to use a fater link or setup a GPS clock in your local lan.
Hope this helps.
~ Karvendhan M