GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- APA: traffic only through one NIC in two-NIC aggre...
Operating System - HP-UX
1847178
Members
5361
Online
110263
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-13-2009 06:30 AM
11-13-2009 06:30 AM
Hi all,
we have a server where the backend network is setup as trunk of 2 NICs (lan1 and lan4), in FEC_AUTO mode and LB_MAC as loadbalancing method.
We noticed that 99% of the traffic goes through lan1 and almost nothing through lan4.
The ports on the switch (Cisco 6509) are setup correctly as a PAgP link.
I've checked the config files on the system and as far as I can see everything seems to be fine.
I do notice that most outbound traffic is towards two NFS servers.
What can I do to make more use of lan4, as the customer is about to increase the load (and traffic) on the server?
Thanks :)
David
--- info:
HP-UX B.11.11
9000/800/SD64000
J4240AA B.11.11.20 Auto-Port Aggregation Software
hp_apaconf:
HP_APA_INTERFACE_NAME[0]=lan900
HP_APA_LOAD_BALANCE_MODE[0]=LB_MAC
HP_APA_HOT_STANDBY[0]=off
HP_APA_GROUP_CAPABILITY[0]=900
HP_APA_KEY[0]=
hp_apaportconf:
HP_APAPORT_INTERFACE_NAME[0]=lan1
HP_APAPORT_GROUP_CAPABILITY[0]=900
HP_APAPORT_CONFIG_MODE[0]=FEC_AUTO
HP_APAPORT_INTERFACE_NAME[1]=lan4
HP_APAPORT_GROUP_CAPABILITY[1]=900
HP_APAPORT_CONFIG_MODE[1]=FEC_AUTO
lanadmin -x -i 900
Link Aggregate PPA # : 900
Link Aggregation Mode : FEC_AUTO
Load Balance Mode : MAC Address based (LB_MAC)
Active Ports PPA # : 1 4
Port(s) not ready : NONE
lanadmin -s -m 900
MTU Size = 1500
Speed = 2000000000
lanadmin -g 1 excerpt:
PPA Number = 1
Station Address = 0x12799e3da4
Administration Status (value) = up(1)
Operation Status (value) = up(1)
lanadmin -g 4 excerpt:
PPA Number = 4
Station Address = 0x12799e3da4
Administration Status (value) = up(1)
Operation Status (value) = up(1)
lanscan -q
900 1 4
ioscan excerpt:
lan1 iether CLAIMED HP A7012-60001
lan4 iether CLAIMED HP A7012-60001
we have a server where the backend network is setup as trunk of 2 NICs (lan1 and lan4), in FEC_AUTO mode and LB_MAC as loadbalancing method.
We noticed that 99% of the traffic goes through lan1 and almost nothing through lan4.
The ports on the switch (Cisco 6509) are setup correctly as a PAgP link.
I've checked the config files on the system and as far as I can see everything seems to be fine.
I do notice that most outbound traffic is towards two NFS servers.
What can I do to make more use of lan4, as the customer is about to increase the load (and traffic) on the server?
Thanks :)
David
--- info:
HP-UX B.11.11
9000/800/SD64000
J4240AA B.11.11.20 Auto-Port Aggregation Software
hp_apaconf:
HP_APA_INTERFACE_NAME[0]=lan900
HP_APA_LOAD_BALANCE_MODE[0]=LB_MAC
HP_APA_HOT_STANDBY[0]=off
HP_APA_GROUP_CAPABILITY[0]=900
HP_APA_KEY[0]=
hp_apaportconf:
HP_APAPORT_INTERFACE_NAME[0]=lan1
HP_APAPORT_GROUP_CAPABILITY[0]=900
HP_APAPORT_CONFIG_MODE[0]=FEC_AUTO
HP_APAPORT_INTERFACE_NAME[1]=lan4
HP_APAPORT_GROUP_CAPABILITY[1]=900
HP_APAPORT_CONFIG_MODE[1]=FEC_AUTO
lanadmin -x -i 900
Link Aggregate PPA # : 900
Link Aggregation Mode : FEC_AUTO
Load Balance Mode : MAC Address based (LB_MAC)
Active Ports PPA # : 1 4
Port(s) not ready : NONE
lanadmin -s -m 900
MTU Size = 1500
Speed = 2000000000
lanadmin -g 1 excerpt:
PPA Number = 1
Station Address = 0x12799e3da4
Administration Status (value) = up(1)
Operation Status (value) = up(1)
lanadmin -g 4 excerpt:
PPA Number = 4
Station Address = 0x12799e3da4
Administration Status (value) = up(1)
Operation Status (value) = up(1)
lanscan -q
900 1 4
ioscan excerpt:
lan1 iether CLAIMED HP A7012-60001
lan4 iether CLAIMED HP A7012-60001
Solved! Go to Solution.
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-13-2009 12:27 PM
11-13-2009 12:27 PM
Re: APA: traffic only through one NIC in two-NIC aggregate
Lots of info like this
"Also, all packets for a specific data flow always flow out through the same physical port until
the data flow is aged out of the distribution table. This means that in order to generate
simultaneous load on each of the physical ports in a link aggregate, start multiple data flows
over the link aggregate."
can be found here
http://www.docs.hp.com/en/netcom.html#Auto%20Port%20Aggregation%20%28APA%29
"Also, all packets for a specific data flow always flow out through the same physical port until
the data flow is aged out of the distribution table. This means that in order to generate
simultaneous load on each of the physical ports in a link aggregate, start multiple data flows
over the link aggregate."
can be found here
http://www.docs.hp.com/en/netcom.html#Auto%20Port%20Aggregation%20%28APA%29
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-13-2009 04:28 PM
11-13-2009 04:28 PM
Solution
LB_MAC works best when the system is speaking with many remote MAC (Ethernet) addresses. If the bulk of the traffic is going to only two MAC addresses, then if you aren't lucky with those two MACs you will only get one link used.
Similarly, if you load balance based on IP, if there are only two IPs with which you are speaking, unless you happen to have picked the IPs "right" you will still have an issue with getting things across both ports.
If you tell it to use TCP (or UDP) port numbers (LB_somethingIcannotrecall) then if you have a "large enough" number of TCP connections, then you should get decent spread, even if you were speaking to only one or two IP or MAC addresses.
Of course that only addresses the outbound traffic. The inbound traffic will depend entirely on what you've setup on the switch.
Similarly, if you load balance based on IP, if there are only two IPs with which you are speaking, unless you happen to have picked the IPs "right" you will still have an issue with getting things across both ports.
If you tell it to use TCP (or UDP) port numbers (LB_somethingIcannotrecall) then if you have a "large enough" number of TCP connections, then you should get decent spread, even if you were speaking to only one or two IP or MAC addresses.
Of course that only addresses the outbound traffic. The inbound traffic will depend entirely on what you've setup on the switch.
there is no rest for the wicked yet the virtuous have no pillows
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2026 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP