Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-20-2000 04:22 AM
07-20-2000 04:22 AM
server 1: (Makes sense to me)
kernel parameters
nbuf = 0
bufpages = 0
dbc_max_pct = 40
Total Physical Memory = 1.50 GB
Buffer Cache = 614
server 1: (Doesn't Makes sense to me)
kernel parameters
nbuf = 0
bufpages = 0
dbc_max_pct = 40
Total Physical Memory = 1.25 GB
Buffer Cache = 159 MB
Why the huge difference in Buffer Cache?
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-20-2000 04:23 AM
07-20-2000 04:23 AM
Re: bufpages
Brian
<*(((>< er
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-20-2000 04:26 AM
07-20-2000 04:26 AM
Re: bufpages
On the first node, the buffer cache is at 40% of 1.5Gb, or 600 Mb give or take a few Mb.s
On the second node the setting allows for 40% of 1.25Gb or 500Mb, if it needs it!
HtH
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-20-2000 04:37 AM
07-20-2000 04:37 AM
Re: bufpages
As the setting of nbuf and bufpages have been set to zero,this causes the dynamic function of buffer cache paging increasing from the set minimum of 5% to set maximum of 40%. The second server's buffer cache is yet to grow to the maximum of 40% of Physical memory. It is behaving fine.
Cheers!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-20-2000 05:15 AM
07-20-2000 05:15 AM
Re: bufpages
In the case of Node 1, the server has been up for 32 days and therefor the system has requested more memory for buffer cache.
In the case of Node 2, the server has been up for 2 days and therefor the system has not requested much memory for buffer cache.
One additional question:
1) If free memory is running low, does the system take back from the memory that has been allocated for buffer cache?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-20-2000 05:27 AM
07-20-2000 05:27 AM
Re: bufpages
As freemem reduces, the buffer cache will get smaller. However, freemem as to go below about 7MB for that to start.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-20-2000 05:28 AM
07-20-2000 05:28 AM
Re: bufpages
The answer to the question is that if the requirement for buffer cache drops, it will be released back to free memory and the system will then use it.
However, If the buffer cache decides it needs the space, then it does not get released, and you could end up with performance issues due to lack of free memory.
HTH
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-20-2000 05:33 AM
07-20-2000 05:33 AM
Solution- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-20-2000 03:35 PM
07-20-2000 03:35 PM
Re: bufpages
since HP-UX can only make use of up to 400MB of buffer cache (if I
remember right), do NOT use "dbc_mac_pct", but use "bufpages" and
"nbuf" to allocate only that much RAM for it. You are wasting it, right now!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-20-2000 11:24 PM
07-20-2000 11:24 PM
Re: bufpages
If a system has 4Gb Ram, and the dbc_pct_max setting is left at default, the system can use up to 2Gb of RAM for buffer cache. This does present some performance issues unfortunately, but it will use the 2Gb if it needs to.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-21-2000 07:26 AM
07-21-2000 07:26 AM
Re: bufpages
dbc_max_pct = dbc_min_pct, then you can benchmark your system and
verify what settings provide the best performance on your system with your applications.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-09-2002 03:20 PM
07-09-2002 03:20 PM
Re: bufpages
bufpages 785920
nbuf 608615
ndilbuffers 30
dbc_max_pct 50
dbc_min_pct 5
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-09-2002 04:24 PM
07-09-2002 04:24 PM
Re: bufpages
Andrew