- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- DLT8000 Tape backup time differences
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-16-2000 06:43 AM
10-16-2000 06:43 AM
I hope someone will be able to give me a place to look to for this.
I use fbackup to dump user data to DLT8000 tape drives. One server (K580) dumps about 27GB in about 2 1/2 hours (running HPUX 10.20 using GSC F/W SCSI adapter). The other server (V2200) dumps about 6GB in 4+ hours (running HPUX 11.00 using C875 F/W SCSI adapter).
Can anyone suggest where/what to look at to see why my V is taking so much longer to dump so much less data? I am stumped. It doesn't make sense to me.
Thanks,
JLS
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-16-2000 06:53 AM
10-16-2000 06:53 AM
Re: DLT8000 Tape backup time differences
That does indeed look strange. Are both using the same fbackup options in their config files ?
Are both the tape drives on a dedicated bus of their own - they dont share it with some disks ? if so on the V class this could be why the backup is running so slowly, anything else on the same SCSI controller as the tape drive could seriously slow down the tape drive. On the V class each controller slot is also shared by another slot, so its possible you think your drive is on a dedicated bus when in fact it is being shared.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-16-2000 07:06 AM
10-16-2000 07:06 AM
Re: DLT8000 Tape backup time differences
As Ken stated, the fbackup options supplied in fbackup's configuration file (-c option) can make a vast difference to performance.
This previous thread may be of interest:-
http://my1.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,1150,0x629a0559ff7cd4118fef0090279cd0f9,00.html
Regards,
John
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-16-2000 07:26 AM
10-16-2000 07:26 AM
Re: DLT8000 Tape backup time differences
ext_bus 1/2/0 c720 CLAIMED INTERFACE SCSI C875 Fast Wide Differential
tape 1/2/0.2.0 stape QUANTUM DLT7000
tape 1/2/0.3.0 stape QUANTUM DLT8000
ctl 1/2/0.7.0 sctl initiator
The DLT7000 is not being used, but the DLT8000 is daisy-chained off it. Could that be causing the slow-down? Should I use a config file, and if so, what values should I use to get better performance?
Thanks for your help...
JLS
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-17-2000 12:44 PM
10-17-2000 12:44 PM
Re: DLT8000 Tape backup time differences
Check the minor numbers of the device files you're using - are you using the "BEST" device file on both?
Also, if you can, watch the lights on the drives while the backup is running. See what density is getting picked and verify that the compression light is on in both cases.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-18-2000 05:09 AM
10-18-2000 05:09 AM
Re: DLT8000 Tape backup time differences
I will be increasing the number of fbackup readers in an attempt to speed the disk IO up.
Thanks again
JLS
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-19-2000 02:02 PM
10-19-2000 02:02 PM
Re: DLT8000 Tape backup time differences
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-11-2000 04:50 AM
12-11-2000 04:50 AM
Re: DLT8000 Tape backup time differences
How did you get it working, which patches/drivers are required?
How did you create the device files?
# ioscan -funCtape
Class I H/W Path Driver S/W State H/W Type Description
===============================================================
tape 1 56/52.3.0 tape2 CLAIMED DEVICE TANDBERGDLT8000
Thanks
Franz
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-11-2000 05:40 AM
12-11-2000 05:40 AM
Solutiontime dd if=/dev/dsk/c0t5d0 of=/dev/null bs=64k count=5000
time dd if=/dev/dsk/c0t5d0 of=/dev/rmt/0m bs=64k count=5000
With the outcome you can calculate the troughput of your disk and tape.