- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- do SG logical volumes need to be strict allocation...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-20-2006 06:53 AM
09-20-2006 06:53 AM
MCSG 11.16 on 11i
Doing some LV extension.
Have halted cluster, made the VGs unsharable, changes to exclusive mode, and now I am doing the lvextend.
I have 2 out of 3 LVs extended. The 3rd lvextend fails because of strict allocation. Do the LVs with a shared VG need to be strict allocation?
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-20-2006 07:11 AM
09-20-2006 07:11 AM
Re: do SG logical volumes need to be strict allocation?
You won't be able to extend it because it was already created with "strict allocation" policy.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-20-2006 07:29 AM
09-20-2006 07:29 AM
Re: do SG logical volumes need to be strict allocation?
Will this allow me to extend a MCSG logical volume without troubles?
Does the MCSG have to remain strict? Even though it was created this way.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-20-2006 07:34 AM
09-20-2006 07:34 AM
Re: do SG logical volumes need to be strict allocation?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-20-2006 07:48 AM
09-20-2006 07:48 AM
Re: do SG logical volumes need to be strict allocation?
I tested it now:
lvchange -s n /dev/vg01/lvol9
Logical volume "/dev/vg01/lvol9" has been successfully changed.
Volume Group configuration for /dev/vg01 has been saved in /etc/lvmconf/vg01.conf
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-20-2006 07:48 AM
09-20-2006 07:48 AM
SolutionServiceguard aside, strict allocation is set by default when a logical volume is created. The idea, of course, is to prevent mirrored extents from sharing the same physical volume or physical volume group when PVG-strict allocation is set.
Regards!
...JRF...