Do you have these issues with patching?

[harry d brown jr]

Here is a new server, just installed by one of our SA's using our supposed Depot's:

For the system, XXX 9000/800 HP-UX B.11.11 , there are 199 installed, 227 recommended, and 297 latest patches applicable to your configuration.

Can anyone say hello, wake up to reality? To me it's just plain stupidity. How can anyone be expected to work on a machine that has more patches missing than installed, and remember this is a NEW install!

Is this typical? I know the machines I'm responsible for in my R&D lab are very up to date. A machine I patched two months ago only has 9 recommended patches and 79 new ones available.

live free or die
harry

[Pete Randall]

Hey Harry!

Nice to hear from you - how have you been?

As far as your query - that's exactly the reason I don't use CPM. The one time I tried it, it came up with so many patches that I wouldn't even consider installing them. I went (and continue to go) with the QPKs instead.

Take care,
Pete

[Ken Hubnik_2]

Same here. There were patches in the depot for hardware that I did not have and software that was never installed.

[James R. Ferguson]

Hi Harry:

Like Pete, I stick with the Support Plus bundles, unless I have a specific problem that requires resolution.

My experience with patches is that there is *always* another one that enhances, corrects, tunes, or otherwise closes some issue that someone, under some conditions has encountered. To keep absolutely current would be a daily exercise. Too, if you are an early-adopter you may find that you need another patch simply to patch the patch.

Regards!

...JRF...

[RolandH]

This tool is only meaningful if you restrict it to critical patches. Otherwise it is ridiculous. We use our own designed tool for that.

Roland
Sometimes you lose and somtimes the others win

[Jeff Schussele]

Hi Harry,

Sounds to me like whomever's supposed to be keeping the depots up to date is sleeping on the job. I'm assuming, of course, that you do have as SA assigned to that task.....

Cheers,
Jeff

[harry d brown jr]

Pete, I've been going insane. I think I need just a little more to do to keep me busy :-)

I don't have a problem using just the QPK's, but this wasn't installed with the latest QPK! There are patches missing that were dated back to 2001!!!

live free or die
harry

[Tom Danzig]

One would think after 6+ years, the amount of patches required for HP-UX 11.00 would start to dwindle. I have found this is definitely not the case. I usually patch twice a year via CPM and I'm still amazed at how many patches are suggested.

I select only "3 star" patches on production boxes. The total number of suggested patches is typically about 100! What a pain.

[Jeff Schussele]

We also take it one step further than just the std QPK & HWE bundles. Our contract calls for HP to also create a custom "Recommended" bundle that goes through an SA review process where we all yay or nay the individual patches for the final content. We have custom Security bundles created as well. We don't use CPM.

Rgds,
Jeff

[Stefan Farrelly]

We only use the QPK and support bundles. Nothing else. With the number of new and replaced patches each week you would go nuts trying to keep uptodate or trying to figure out what should go on or what shouldnt. I leave that to an exercise only undertaken every few months when the new QPK bundle comes out - as these are infrequent and rigorously tested by HP on their own internal servers before released to the public.

For example; we just had a problem with a Gigabit card on 11i and we updated the patches only to find HP has release 3 versions of it this year already, and each one changes the behaviour on our server. Great. I have enough problems with the behaviour of LVM and how it handles things like disk failures/replacement after Ive installed each new QPK bundle, there is no way Im going to punish myself by installing patches any more frequently than when the QPK bundles come out - and at least te QPK bundles are tested (together), the CPM and supposed HP Customer recommended bundles arent tested together - good luck if you try them.

[Steven E. Protter]

I feel your pain.

After doing a new install last May and supposedly building an Ignite Golden image, I spent three months patching the sytem, rebuilding the image.

Then the applications started going in and I spent more time putting in more patches. The application vendors like Oracle have out of date and incomplete and superseded OS patch lists.

I REALLY feel your pain.

SEP

[BFA6]

Hi,

At the moment if a server is in production it is only patched if it has a problem. We do not have a test box where I can install patches & see what they do to the system.

There was one new server built with latest version of CD's and it still had 79 critical patches missing.

Regards,

Hilary

[Mark Greene_1]

I've tried to adopt an approach that is conservative without being lax. The only patches I install anywhere near immediately are the security patches. After that, it's the Quality and hardware kits, but one release down; i.e., when the June patches come out, I'll install the March sets including whatever superceded patches are out. This way I'm fairly well patched without being on the bleeding edge.

What irkes me is that a brand new box from HP is never fully patched. What's the point of getting a factory racked and OS-installed system if I still have to go in and patch the thing immediately upon delivery?

mark