HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: FTP failure - bad NIC driver?
Operating System - HP-UX
1825720
Members
3167
Online
109686
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-11-2001 04:03 PM
12-11-2001 04:03 PM
I previously asked about an FTP problem where I had an NT box which FTP'd files to two HP 10.20 on the same hub and the session would fail to complete. I mentioned that a very large ping to the HP-20s would sometimes fail.
I don't know if it will solve our original problem but we have swapped the connection we were using on a separate NIC with the built-in one. And the large ping problem is not present on the built-in LAN! It seems to be confined to the card and is now present on the other IP address. We did this on both machines and in both cases it was the same.
Single packet pings always worked. It was only when packets had to be reassembled that the pings failed. Lanadmin never showed any errors and neither did netstat so I can only assume there is some bug in the driver for these cards.
Of course, the next question is what kind of cards do we have? Don't know. They came with the machines from HP and they are our production machines so no one wants to open them up just to look. (We can only do that sort of thing at 3AM when we are more or less off the air.) Is there a way to tell which card it is without opening up the box? Lanadmin say: btlan02 Hewlett-Packard LAN adapter Rev0
Is anyone aware of a known problem with separate NICs? Is there some patch they should have put in? Uname -a says: B.10.20 A 9000/871
Thanks
Ron
I don't know if it will solve our original problem but we have swapped the connection we were using on a separate NIC with the built-in one. And the large ping problem is not present on the built-in LAN! It seems to be confined to the card and is now present on the other IP address. We did this on both machines and in both cases it was the same.
Single packet pings always worked. It was only when packets had to be reassembled that the pings failed. Lanadmin never showed any errors and neither did netstat so I can only assume there is some bug in the driver for these cards.
Of course, the next question is what kind of cards do we have? Don't know. They came with the machines from HP and they are our production machines so no one wants to open them up just to look. (We can only do that sort of thing at 3AM when we are more or less off the air.) Is there a way to tell which card it is without opening up the box? Lanadmin say: btlan02 Hewlett-Packard LAN adapter Rev0
Is anyone aware of a known problem with separate NICs? Is there some patch they should have put in? Uname -a says: B.10.20 A 9000/871
Thanks
Ron
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-11-2001 04:17 PM
12-11-2001 04:17 PM
Re: FTP failure - bad NIC driver?
Hi,
To find the type of cards,
run ioscan command as shown:
#>ioscan -nkfClan
Class I H/W Path Driver S/W State H/W Type Description
===================================================================
lan 0 0/0/0/0 btlan3 CLAIMED INTERFACE PCI Ethernet (10110019)
/dev/ether0
lan 1 0/5/0/0 btlan5 CLAIMED INTERFACE HP A5230A/B5509BA PCI 10/100Base-TX Addon
lan 2 1/8/0/0 gelan CLAIMED INTERFACE HP A4926A PCI 1000Base-SX Adapter
/dev/gelan2
***
You may be having a missing patch on the card with the problem. Do a
#swlist -l product |grep -i lan
to check the lan related patches you have. If you can post the card and patch info, maybe somebody here can help you with more info.
(you can also check on the back of the card to see for any modelnumber info)
HTH
raj
To find the type of cards,
run ioscan command as shown:
#>ioscan -nkfClan
Class I H/W Path Driver S/W State H/W Type Description
===================================================================
lan 0 0/0/0/0 btlan3 CLAIMED INTERFACE PCI Ethernet (10110019)
/dev/ether0
lan 1 0/5/0/0 btlan5 CLAIMED INTERFACE HP A5230A/B5509BA PCI 10/100Base-TX Addon
lan 2 1/8/0/0 gelan CLAIMED INTERFACE HP A4926A PCI 1000Base-SX Adapter
/dev/gelan2
***
You may be having a missing patch on the card with the problem. Do a
#swlist -l product |grep -i lan
to check the lan related patches you have. If you can post the card and patch info, maybe somebody here can help you with more info.
(you can also check on the back of the card to see for any modelnumber info)
HTH
raj
Take it easy.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-11-2001 04:45 PM
12-11-2001 04:45 PM
Re: FTP failure - bad NIC driver?
Thanks, here is the info from the two commands. I hope you can read it. Wish the window was bigger so I could see what it will look like.
Ron
ioscan -nkfClan
Class I H/W Path Driver S/W State H/W Type Description
===================================================================
lan 0 8/16/6 lan2 CLAIMED INTERFACE Built-in LAN
/dev/diag/lan0 /dev/ether0 /dev/lan0
lan 1 8/20/5/1 btlan0 CLAIMED INTERFACE EISA card INP0500
lan 2 8/20/5/2 btlan0 CLAIMED INTERFACE EISA card INP0500
% swlist -l product |grep -i lan
Networking B.10.20 HP-UX_10.0_Lanlink_Product
PHNE_10770 B.10.00.00.AA dhcpclient for 100BT lan
PHNE_18924 B.10.00.00.AA LAN products cumulative Patch
Ron
ioscan -nkfClan
Class I H/W Path Driver S/W State H/W Type Description
===================================================================
lan 0 8/16/6 lan2 CLAIMED INTERFACE Built-in LAN
/dev/diag/lan0 /dev/ether0 /dev/lan0
lan 1 8/20/5/1 btlan0 CLAIMED INTERFACE EISA card INP0500
lan 2 8/20/5/2 btlan0 CLAIMED INTERFACE EISA card INP0500
% swlist -l product |grep -i lan
Networking B.10.20 HP-UX_10.0_Lanlink_Product
PHNE_10770 B.10.00.00.AA dhcpclient for 100BT lan
PHNE_18924 B.10.00.00.AA LAN products cumulative Patch
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-11-2001 04:58 PM
12-11-2001 04:58 PM
Solution
Hi,
You are using Interphase cards! I think we found the culprit.
Seems that this is a known issue :
From:
http://us-support2.external.hp.com/cki/bin/doc.pl/sid=52a9d57318c7cc4fb8/screen=ckiDisplayDocument?docId=200000050068121
EISA 100Mbit INP0500 NICs are vulnerable to RF interference. DocId: KBRCKBRC00002837 Updated: 6/23/00 12:58:14 AM
PROBLEM
Extremely poor peformnace on two servers in a data center with many other
unaffected systems. On these two D-class servers affeceted, they are the only
ones in the data center with EISA 100Mbit cards, all other machines have HSC
100Mbit cards going to the same switches and are fine. Syslog shows cable
disconenct messages, cards refusing to run at 100Mbit half-duplex and dropping
to 10Mbits with poor performance at that speed too.CONFIGURATION
D250 & D350 10.20 EISA INP0500 Interphase 100Mbit cards.RESOLUTION
Patching to latest level of the boxes and the switch were unsuccessful. Latest
firmware added to switch, still no joy. Check with RF meter showed substantial
RF interference around the systems. Customer givent he choice of trying
shielded cables or going to HSC cards - as he already had working HSC cards in
the environment he decided on these. No problems after changing to HSC cards
Hope that solves the mystery.
raj
You are using Interphase cards! I think we found the culprit.
Seems that this is a known issue :
From:
http://us-support2.external.hp.com/cki/bin/doc.pl/sid=52a9d57318c7cc4fb8/screen=ckiDisplayDocument?docId=200000050068121
EISA 100Mbit INP0500 NICs are vulnerable to RF interference. DocId: KBRCKBRC00002837 Updated: 6/23/00 12:58:14 AM
PROBLEM
Extremely poor peformnace on two servers in a data center with many other
unaffected systems. On these two D-class servers affeceted, they are the only
ones in the data center with EISA 100Mbit cards, all other machines have HSC
100Mbit cards going to the same switches and are fine. Syslog shows cable
disconenct messages, cards refusing to run at 100Mbit half-duplex and dropping
to 10Mbits with poor performance at that speed too.CONFIGURATION
D250 & D350 10.20 EISA INP0500 Interphase 100Mbit cards.RESOLUTION
Patching to latest level of the boxes and the switch were unsuccessful. Latest
firmware added to switch, still no joy. Check with RF meter showed substantial
RF interference around the systems. Customer givent he choice of trying
shielded cables or going to HSC cards - as he already had working HSC cards in
the environment he decided on these. No problems after changing to HSC cards
Hope that solves the mystery.
raj
Take it easy.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP