Operating System - HP-UX
1855490 Members
3448 Online
104111 Solutions
New Discussion

GCC 3.1 depot for HP-UX 11.00

 
Stuart Powell
Super Advisor

GCC 3.1 depot for HP-UX 11.00

I have two L2000 servers that are stuck on HP-UX 11.00 for the foreseeable future. I have The Gnu Compiler Collection installed on one, but got rid of the depot before I could get it installed on the other.(This happened a couple of years ago) I'm looking for the depot. Does anyone know where I could find it? Most sites only have newer versions for HP-UX 11.11 or higher.

Stuart
Sometimes the best answer is another question
7 REPLIES 7
Rick Garland
Honored Contributor

Re: GCC 3.1 depot for HP-UX 11.00

I find 3.4.3 version available in source at gatekeep.cs.utah.edu
Stuart Powell
Super Advisor

Re: GCC 3.1 depot for HP-UX 11.00

Rick,

A note on that site:
* Sorry, but we've only built and tested gcc 3.X on HP-UX 11.11 (PA-RISC)
and HP-UX 11.23 (Itanium). Users with OS'es prior to HP-UX 11.11 are strongly
urged to upgrade to at least HP-UX 11.11.

That is not an option at this time for me.

Stuart
Sometimes the best answer is another question
Paul Cross_1
Respected Contributor

Re: GCC 3.1 depot for HP-UX 11.00

Paul Cross_1
Respected Contributor

Re: GCC 3.1 depot for HP-UX 11.00

PS: there is also a depot file for an older version

http://www.cmve.net/~merijn/gcc-2.95.3-11.00.sd.gz
Florian Heigl (new acc)
Honored Contributor

Re: GCC 3.1 depot for HP-UX 11.00

TheWrittenWord-software always have a freely available build on their ftp server, which is tested on works very well.

yesterday I stood at the edge. Today I'm one step ahead.
Florian Heigl (new acc)
Honored Contributor

Re: GCC 3.1 depot for HP-UX 11.00

I forgot the link: www.thewrittenword.com / ftp.thewrittenword.com
yesterday I stood at the edge. Today I'm one step ahead.
Stuart Powell
Super Advisor

Re: GCC 3.1 depot for HP-UX 11.00

Paul,
I'm downloading now. I'll look for the release notes before installing.

Florian,
If I strike out the Paul's site I'll follow up with your's.

Thanks to both of you.
Sometimes the best answer is another question