- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: GCC vs. aC++
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-06-2005 02:06 AM
06-06-2005 02:06 AM
I've been using GCC for years to compile all my stuff. I never considered purchasing the HP compiler since GCC has always been readily available and I didn't have to waste any time having someone issue a PO. :)
However, my company is starting to rely more and more on open-source software for mission-critical apps. The Solaris guys all use Sun's compiler and they were surprised to learn that I used GCC; it is good enough for me as far as I'm concerned.
Execept for the fact that aC++ probably produces more optimized code, is there any
other reason why I should not stick with GCC.
I'm not looking into compiling homemade kernel modules or doing any PA-RISC specific development so any features like these are of no interest to me.
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-06-2005 02:23 AM
06-06-2005 02:23 AM
SolutionThe packages from http://hpux.ee.ualberta.ca/ are compiled using gcc
live free or die
harry d brown jr
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-06-2005 03:10 AM
06-06-2005 03:10 AM
Re: GCC vs. aC++
Also, it's free.
Look at the forum and compare problems using gcc against problems using aCC, not entirely fair unless you know the proportion of users who use each compiler I agree.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-06-2005 02:59 PM
06-06-2005 02:59 PM
Re: GCC vs. aC++
The only risk you have is possible non-suported libraries and calling HP for production code support is out.
we actually use both for our production system: aC++ and gcc.
if one uses Oracle 10g, then one requirement is the ANSI C compiler from HP.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-06-2005 07:02 PM
06-06-2005 07:02 PM