- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- HP-UX 11.31 openSSL upgrade required to utilise >=...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Wednesday
Wednesday
HP-UX 11.31 openSSL upgrade required to utilise >= TLS 1.2 to MS Exchange
Apologies if I've missed this somewhere when seraching the forums ...
I need to upgrade openSSL, looking to go from 1.0.2u to 3.015 (or 3.017), but can't seem to find any useful/helpful information on the required coniguration changes to sendmail. I keep seeing notes about using STARTTLS, and have already tested connection to customer's Exchange server to illicit STARTTLS prompt from it - which seems to work okay.
Any of you good and great people out there been thorugh this upgrade process (actually getting openSSL package onto the server is fine - I'm familiat enough with swinstall, and have taken note where it says you need to first uninstall the old openSSL (otherwise you're certain to run into problems)) - it's just all the bits post package install, about creating required SSL certificates and changes required to sendmail.cf (and others?) that I'm truggling to find information about.
Many thanks
Paul
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
yesterday
yesterday
Re: HP-UX 11.31 openSSL upgrade required to utilise >= TLS 1.2 to MS Exchange
> [...] Any of you good and great people out there been thorugh this
> upgrade process [...]
Not I. I haven't used sendmail in decades (before TLS), so I know
nothing, but...
It's not obvious to me that you'd need to make any changes to the
sendmail certificate configuration because of an OpenSSL version change.
Unless the certificates were created using some algorithm which is now
obsolete/unsupported-by-OpenSSL, I'd expect them to be as valid with a
new OpenSSL as they were with the old one. (But what do I know?)
The worry that _I_ would have is that if your current sendmail
program was linked (non-static) with an old version of OpenSSL, and
you're _removing_ that old version of OpenSSL, that your old sendmail
program might not work with the new version of OpenSSL. I believe that
there have been more than a few API changes between OpenSSL 1.0.x and
OpenSSL 3.0.x, so your old sendmail program might not work as expected
on a system with (only) a new (shared-object) OpenSSL kit.
I'd expect that a newer sendmail program built/compatible with
OpenSSL 3.0.x would have a better chance of running than your old one.
You'd need to check whether your old certificates would be compatible
with the newer sendmail program, but I'd still doubt that a newer
OpenSSL (itself) would be the cause of problems there.
Perhaps someone with actual knowledge will join the discussion, and
straighten out my potential (probable?) misunderstandings.