- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: HP-UX 11i virtualization
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-13-2007 12:31 PM
03-13-2007 12:31 PM
HP-UX 11i virtualization
HP-UX 11.0 is not supported inside VSE on 11i?
Here's my problem, I currently have HP-UX 11.0 installed on an HP-9000 d250 server, which only supports 32-bit. I need to install oracle 9.2.0 on this server. Oracle only supports 9.2.0 in 64-bit version. So, short of buying a new server with 64-bit capability,
I thought of possibly adding a VSE environment on another HP-UX server ( rp3410) that I already have in-house, and running the HP-UX 11.0 in that VSE.
It appears that this is not possible, and not supported,according to HP documentation. Wondered if anyone has installed 11.0 in a VSE on 11i or higher?
Thanks for any guidance!
Rob
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-13-2007 01:18 PM
03-13-2007 01:18 PM
Re: HP-UX 11i virtualization
Your D250 is a great little server but Oracle 9 is way, way beyond it's capacity. Take a look at a used A500 or rp2400 series. Using your D250 for a heavy duty (and very expensive) database like Oracle is like putting a 2 ton trailer hitch on a mini-Cooper. Your D250 would be a good web server or a great centralized management server to track info and performance on other servers.
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-13-2007 02:27 PM
03-13-2007 02:27 PM
Re: HP-UX 11i virtualization
rumors had it that some things were possible with the very first beta-like vpar version, i.e. 'helping' it to run on workstations, but 11.00 is not possible, there's a whole bunch of kernel features (i.e. relocation, as the memory range won't start at 0x00000[...], but instead somewhere).
besides, 11.11 and beyond have a lot of desirable features to offer, including usually higher performance.
if you're on a ...extremely tight... budget You could look into replacing your D-Class' cpu board with one from a D320 or better; I've gotten myself a dual 64bit board off ebay for something like $15, but to be honest, the D-class found it's place on the pile of outdated stuff in my cellar, and the cpu board is filed away somewhere.
I would think You're better off investing $500 for two C3700's or one A500, as they're a few years newer You'll even have a somewhat better availability; i wouldn't expect the D-Class to keep running forever, it's bound to fail some day.
And of course, you'll get roughly 4 times the performance with just one current cpu, plus U2W scsi instead of F/W scsi, and also a FAR higher memory throughput.
At my company (ISV) we have a little C3600 to run develepment oracle databases, one 9i and one 10g.
I can't say the performance is stunning, but it gets the job done nicely. Right now it's got 1.5GB ram and we'll probably upgrade it to 3GB (2x1024 and 2x512MB for optimum bandwidth); after that it should handle it's workload easily. They come really cheap, even from HP certified resellers, so you can put it on support if required.
Still I'd recommend You get an A-class or something current like the rp3440 so You can out for 11v3.
florian
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-14-2007 01:25 PM
03-14-2007 01:25 PM
Re: HP-UX 11i virtualization
Besides if the VSE is the Itanium Virtual Machine, that only runs on Integrity (aka Itanium) hardware, and so it wouldn't run on your rp3410 in the first place. And if you did have an Integrity/Itanium system, since 11.0 didn't run on Itanium, it couldn't be run as a guest OS anyway.
The suggestion to go to a newer system is probably goodness. If you think you will have interest in the virutal machine stuff, go with an Integrity system. Of the more recent stuff, the rx2660 <> might be the most interesting. As far as used systems, I've no idea how far back in the HW space the virutal machine stuff goes with its support. Regardless, you do _NOT_ want anything based on an Itanium 1 (aka Merced) processor - eg the rx4610, rx9610 and the i2000.
Ignoring the question of suporting the virtual machine stuff, the rx1620 might be interesting, older systems like the rx4640, rx1600, rx2600 or rx2620. There is also the rx5670.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-14-2007 09:20 PM
03-14-2007 09:20 PM
Re: HP-UX 11i virtualization
HP-UX 11.00 can certainly run some of these products, but as far as the overall VSE environment goes, HP-UX is NOT included, bearing in mind support ended 31st December 2006