- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- HP-UX PA-RISC vs HP-UX Itanium performance & Relia...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-15-2008 12:37 AM
04-15-2008 12:37 AM
I am considering HP for our Oracle Applications EBS implementations.
I have 2 options. HP-UX on PA-RISC and HP-UX on IA64.
I am looking at the better option in terms of performance and reliability(stability).
Given that PA-RISC is an older architecture, I am also looking at the future of this architecture(i.e. supportability).
Pl let me know
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-15-2008 01:07 AM
04-15-2008 01:07 AM
SolutionThe fastest PA-RISC was still only half as fast as an Itanium2. You will save lots of money on per-cpu licences by going Itanium2. Itanium2 (IA64) has been out for several years now.
The support for these chips is mature, both from HP and from Oracle. If you find a new bug on a PA-RISC version I don't think you will get much support for it going forward.
Go for HP-UX 11iv3 as well. Its faster, more flexible and that is where the money is being spent. 11iv3 also has a longer support life than 11iv2 or 11iv1 which both end on the same date.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-15-2008 03:10 AM
04-15-2008 03:10 AM
Re: HP-UX PA-RISC vs HP-UX Itanium performance & Reliability for Oracle Applications E-Business Suite
Please see the below links. Would give you some info.
http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=787103
http://www.intel.com/performance/server/itanium/summary.htm
http://www.ideasinternational.com/benchmark/ben010.aspx
Regards.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-15-2008 04:15 AM
04-15-2008 04:15 AM
Re: HP-UX PA-RISC vs HP-UX Itanium performance & Reliability for Oracle Applications E-Business Suite
Should I go for this or think of IA64?
This cpu was released in 2005.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-15-2008 09:07 AM
04-15-2008 09:07 AM
Re: HP-UX PA-RISC vs HP-UX Itanium performance & Reliability for Oracle Applications E-Business Suite
http://www.hp.com/products1/servers/direction.html
If you have no application dependancy on a PA-RISC server then IPF (IA) is the way to go.
Regards
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-15-2008 09:55 AM
04-15-2008 09:55 AM
Re: HP-UX PA-RISC vs HP-UX Itanium performance & Reliability for Oracle Applications E-Business Suite
From the page mentioned:
"We plan to sell HP-UX 11i on HP 9000 entry-class, mid-range and Superdome systems until at least December 2008, with support until at least December 2013."
http://www.hp.com/products1/servers/direction.html
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-15-2008 10:13 AM
04-15-2008 10:13 AM
Re: HP-UX PA-RISC vs HP-UX Itanium performance & Reliability for Oracle Applications E-Business Suite
Thanks for the correction.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-15-2008 10:36 PM
04-15-2008 10:36 PM