- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-24-2010 02:21 AM
06-24-2010 02:21 AM
HP-UX Performance Issue
I will brief here very strange and peculiar performance problem with two HP-Itanuim Servers
The Server details are
Rx2660 (Good Configuration but very bad performance)
CPU: Two dual core (1.42 GHz, 12MB 9120N) processor
Memory: 16GB
Disk: 146GB 10k SAS
OS version HP-UX 11.31 release Sep2009
N/W: 1gbps
Script runs time: 68 min
Rx4640 (Not that great Configuration as 2660 but very impressive and faster performance)
CPU: HP mx2 dual processor
Memory 8GB
Disk: 73GB
OS version HP-UX 11.31 release Sep2009
N/W: 1gbps
Script runs time: 20 Sec
When we run congnos script the script will get complete in 15sec on rx4640 vs. it takes more than hour (68min) on Rx2660.
When the congnos script runs it call DB which is running on other Server and choose the fields and performs insert to another DB. In this case both Servers ( 2660 & 4640) are connecting to same DB Server. Also the DB client is also same on both the Servers.
If I compare both Server CPU, memory, disk and N/W the Slower system (2660) has all good horsepower compare to rx4640 but, when performance comes it acts like 10year old box.
We have tried to bring both OS same version and all kernel parameters same but not able to understands why the performance differ with such huge unbelievable difference.
Really appreciate if we get faster response on this.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-24-2010 03:11 AM
06-24-2010 03:11 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-24-2010 05:40 AM
06-24-2010 05:40 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
sar -L
iostat -L -t
Do you have tusc installed on the 4640?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-24-2010 05:46 AM
06-24-2010 05:46 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-24-2010 07:01 AM
06-24-2010 07:01 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
rx4640 (Great Perf)
rx2660 (Bad Perf)
#uname -a >>/tmp/perfor/hp1.txt
#bdf >>/tmp/perfor/hp1.txt
#dmesg >>/tmp/perfor/hp1.txt
#uptime >>/tmp/perfor/hp1.txt
#model >>/tmp/perfor/hp1.txt
#sar -u 2 10 >>/tmp/perfor/hp1.txt
#sar -d 2 10 >>/tmp/perfor/hp1.txt
#sar -b 2 10 >>/tmp/perfor/hp1.txt
#sar -v 2 10 >>/tmp/perfor/hp1.txt
#vmstat 2 10 >>/tmp/perfor/hp1.txt
#iostat 2 10 >>/tmp/perfor/hp1.txt
#swapinfo -tam >>/tmp/perfor/hp1.txt
#top -d2 -s10 -f /tmp/toperf.txt
#cat /tmp/toperf.txt
#ipcs â mob >>/tmp/perfor/hp1.txt
#exit
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-24-2010 07:02 AM
06-24-2010 07:02 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-24-2010 07:03 AM
06-24-2010 07:03 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-24-2010 07:05 AM
06-24-2010 07:05 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
These both Servers are connected to DB host thru L2 N/W switch.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-24-2010 07:45 AM
06-24-2010 07:45 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
Synchronous Page I/O error occurred while paging to/from NFS server qiublrboanfs001
file system is /home
Look suspicious in rx2660 logs. How much are /home and NFS involved?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-24-2010 04:56 PM
06-24-2010 04:56 PM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
netstat -s > before.netstat
lanadmin -g mibstats
- run the cognos script -
netstat -s > after.netstat
lanadmin -g mibstats
where you replace
You can run the before and after files through "beforeafter" from ftp://ftp.cup.hp.com/dist/networking/tools
beforeafter before after > delta
and that will subtract all the numbers it finds in before from their counterparts in after - giving you the change over the interval.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-25-2010 03:45 AM
06-25-2010 03:45 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
 Â
1. Cognos AW Runtime (Scriupts are being run from here) : /apps/sterling/sbi/cognos/ap/bin (nfs mount is /apps/sterling & NFS host:qiublrboanfs001)
2. Oracle Client : /home/oracle11g_client/oracle_home   ( nfs mount is /home & NFS host:qiublrboanfs001 )
Here both the file systems are exported by single NFS Server qiublrboanfs001 and it is the same env for rx2600 and rx4640.
In below trace Between two Red marked line it has take near 7mins , where it has to happened in less then second.
Trace During Application
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
jobstream -- start run on qiublrboaapp011.blrqa-nis (25-Jun-2010 15:56:34)
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:36] initialLoadStartDate = ''
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:36] initialLoadEndDate = ''
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:36] DS_LOG_DIR = '/apps/sterling/sbi/cognos/ap/datamanager/log/20100625155634'
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:36] DS_UDA_FETCH_ROWS = '50'
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:36] DS_UDA_BULKWRITE_ROWS = '50'
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:36] DS_LOB_MAXMEM_SIZE = '65536'
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:36] DS_LOB_BUF_SIZE = '8000'
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:36] DS_DBMS_TRIM = 'SPACE'
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:36] DS_RUN_TIMESTAMP = 2010-06-25 15:56:35
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:36] DS_JOBSTREAM_NAME = 'Configuration'
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:36] DS_JOBSTREAM_FNAME = 'Configuration'
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:36] DS_AUDIT_ID = 1
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:36] DS_JOB_AUDIT_ID = 1
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:36] DS_RUN_ID = 1
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:36] DS_LOG_NAME = '/apps/sterling/sbi/cognos/ap/datamanager/log/20100625155634/Job_Configuration_0001.log'
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:36] DS_MAX_RECURSION = '100'
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:36] . TRACE_VALUES = 'PROGRESS,DETAIL,INTERNAL,SQL,EXECUTEDSQL,USER,VARIABLE'
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:36] . AUDIT_VALUES = 'TIMING,ALERT,USER'
[PROGRESSÂ Â - 15:56:36] JobStream 'Configuration'; starting
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:36] Start Node 1 'Start'; Idle -> Succeeded
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:36] Build Node 2 'YFS_CAT_DOMAIN_LOCALE'; Pending -> Executing
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:36] Build Node 3 'YFS_REGION_SCHEMA'; Pending -> Executing
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:36] Build Node 4 'YFS_REGION'; Pending -> Executing
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:36] Build Node 5 'YFS_STATUS_MODIFICATION_TYPE'; Pending -> Executing
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:36] Build Node 6 'YFS_COMMON_CODE'; Pending -> Executing
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:36] Build Node 7 'YFS_REGION_USAGE'; Pending -> Executing
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:36] Build Node 8 'YFS_DATA_SECURITY_GROUP'; Pending -> Executing
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:36] Build Node 9 'YFS_REGION_BEST_MATCH'; Pending -> Executing
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:36] Build Node 10 'YFS_ORGANIZATION'; Pending -> Executing
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:36] Build Node 11 'YFS_CUSTOMER_GRADE'; Pending -> Executing
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:36] Build Node 12 'YFS_CHARGE_CATEGORY'; Pending -> Executing
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:36] Build Node 13 'YFS_PAYMENT_TYPE'; Pending -> Executing
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:36] Build Node 14 'YFS_HOLD_TYPE'; Pending -> Executing
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:36] Build Node 15 'YFS_DOCUMENT_PARAMS'; Pending -> Executing
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:36] Build Node 16 'YFS_LOCALIZED_STRINGS'; Pending -> Executing
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:36] Build Node 17 'YFS_CATEGORY_DOMAIN'; Pending -> Executing
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:37] Build Node 15 'YFS_DOCUMENT_PARAMS'; initializing
[PROGRESSÂ Â - 15:56:38] Build Node 15 'YFS_DOCUMENT_PARAMS'; executing (pid 3689)
[DETAILÂ Â Â Â - 15:56:38] Build Node 15 'YFS_DOCUMENT_PARAMS'; component 'YFS_DOCUMENT_PARAMS', RunId 1, AuditId 2
[INTERNALÂ Â - 15:56:39] Build Node 15 'YFS_DOCUMENT_PARAMS'; Executing -> Succeeded
[PROGRESSÂ Â - 15:56:39] Build Node 15 'YFS_DOCUMENT_PARAMS'; succeeded
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:39] RESULT = TRUE
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 15:56:39] DM_COMPONENT_AUDIT_ID = 2
[INTERNALÂ Â - 16:03:38] Build Node 4 'YFS_REGION'; initializing
[INTERNALÂ Â - 16:03:38] Build Node 13 'YFS_PAYMENT_TYPE'; initializing
[PROGRESSÂ Â - 16:03:38] Build Node 4 'YFS_REGION'; executing (pid 3678)
[PROGRESSÂ Â - 16:03:38] Build Node 13 'YFS_PAYMENT_TYPE'; executing (pid 3687)
[DETAILÂ Â Â Â - 16:03:39] Build Node 4 'YFS_REGION'; component 'YFS_REGION', RunId 1, AuditId 3
[DETAILÂ Â Â Â - 16:03:39] Build Node 13 'YFS_PAYMENT_TYPE'; component 'YFS_PAYMENT_TYPE', RunId 1, AuditId 4
[INTERNALÂ Â - 16:03:39] Build Node 4 'YFS_REGION'; Executing -> Succeeded
[PROGRESSÂ Â - 16:03:39] Build Node 4 'YFS_REGION'; succeeded
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 16:03:39] RESULT = TRUE
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 16:03:39] DM_COMPONENT_AUDIT_ID = 3
[INTERNALÂ Â - 16:03:39] Build Node 13 'YFS_PAYMENT_TYPE'; Executing -> Succeeded
[PROGRESSÂ Â - 16:03:39] Build Node 13 'YFS_PAYMENT_TYPE'; succeeded
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 16:03:39] RESULT = TRUE
[VARIABLEÂ Â - 16:03:39] DM_COMPONENT_AUDIT_ID = 4
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-25-2010 03:54 AM
06-25-2010 03:54 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
beofre= before running cognos script
after1= while running cognos script sample 1
after2= while running cognos script sample 2
after3= while running cognos script sample 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-25-2010 03:58 AM
06-25-2010 03:58 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
Please see some more lanshow output from slow porf Server i.e. rx2660.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-25-2010 03:59 AM
06-25-2010 03:59 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
I have exlpained the NFS setup in the attachment also some details about cognos script
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-25-2010 10:13 AM
06-25-2010 10:13 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-25-2010 11:58 AM
06-25-2010 11:58 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
Longshot, but, the problem systems vmstat output shows 1 blocked process.
procs memory page faults cpu
r b w
1 1 0
1 1 0
1 1 0
1 1 0
1 1 0
If this blocked process "starts when"/"disappears after" the cognos job is done, most probably this process has something to do with why the job taking so long.
So then find the process and see where its blocked up on.
glance will give the wait reason for the process, the hp support crashinfo utility can give you, with crashinfo -c /stand/vmunix /dev/kmem, the wait reason/process stack of the process
And did you log a support call with cognos, ibm?, support ?
Greetz,
Chris
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-25-2010 11:44 PM
06-25-2010 11:44 PM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
you are comparing an ENTRY level server with a Medium Level Server.
Perf will NOT be same on both the servers.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-26-2010 02:42 PM
06-26-2010 02:42 PM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
Once we know what the application is doing during that 7 minute period we can better decide where to look at the slower system's configuration.
Regards,
Dave
I work at HPE
HPE Support Center offers support for your HPE services and products when and how you need it. Get started with HPE Support Center today.
[Any personal opinions expressed are mine, and not official statements on behalf of Hewlett Packard Enterprise]

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-28-2010 03:18 AM
06-28-2010 03:18 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
Pls find the attached crashinfo out put ,
where we have collected the info 5 times while cognos scripting.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-28-2010 01:27 PM
06-28-2010 01:27 PM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
My ie has problems with saving/opening the rar attachment. A text file as attachment should be better..
Greetz,
Chris
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-28-2010 08:21 PM
06-28-2010 08:21 PM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-29-2010 12:08 AM
06-29-2010 12:08 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
Downloading 7-Zip 9.14 works wonders. It has a GUI to look inside the .rar.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-29-2010 05:48 AM
06-29-2010 05:48 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
Looks like rundsjob is the parent process and rundsnode the childprocesses running beneath it. And this childprocesses have allready not run for 48 seconds.
The system also seems to be using automount and nis.
Connect as dave said a tusc to the rundsjob process and see what happens..
# date;./tusc -p -f -v -E -n -T%X -r all -w all -o /var/tmp/tusc_rundsjob.out
Greetz,
Chris
PS. Dennis, not to sure what I can do with 7-zip. I have a rar extracter on my pc, but its IE/java in IE, that cant seem to open something with a rar extension in a IE window. And when I save the file to my harddisk, I only get a getattachment.do file.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-29-2010 09:45 AM
06-29-2010 09:45 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
(Before 7-zip, my rar extractor would only work on the command line.)
>but it's IE/java in IE, that cant seem to open something with a rar extension in a IE window.
Hmm, I've seen that problem with IE and .zip files in the forum. But my IE8 has no problem with .rar. I use firefox.
>when I save the file to my harddisk, I only get a getattachment.do file.
Hmm. You could try the same .Zip workaround for rar?
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/getattachment.do?attachmentId=359505&ext=.RAR
(Or use .txt and rename it after the download.)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-30-2010 01:30 AM
06-30-2010 01:30 AM
Re: HP-UX Performance Issue
Jun 23 17:01:23 qiublrboaapp011 syslog: ypbind: no entry in /var/yp/secureservers file
Jun 23 17:01:23 qiublrboaapp011 /usr/sbin/rpc.lockd[1155]: Cannot get address for transport udp host \1 service lockd
Jun 23 17:01:23 qiublrboaapp011 /usr/sbin/rpc.lockd[1155]: Cannot establish NLM service over /dev/udp: transport setup proble
m.
Jun 23 17:01:23 qiublrboaapp011 /usr/sbin/rpc.lockd[1155]: Cannot get address for transport tcp host \1 service lockd
Jun 23 17:01:23 qiublrboaapp011 /usr/sbin/rpc.lockd[1155]: Cannot establish NLM service over /dev/tcp: transport setup proble
m.
Jun 23 17:01:23 qiublrboaapp011 /usr/sbin/rpc.lockd[1155]: Could not start NLM service for any protocol. Exiting.
Jun 23 17:01:23 qiublrboaapp011 nfs4cbd[1174]: nfsv4 cannot determine local hostname binding for transport tcp - delegations
will not be available on this transport
We have stopped and restarted lockd and nfs.client service and here is the output
/sbin/init.d/lockmgr stop
killing rpc.lockd
killing rpc.statd
# /sbin/init.d/lockmgr start
Starting up the Status Monitor daemon
/usr/sbin/rpc.statd
Starting up the lock manager daemon
/usr/sbin/rpc.lockd
# /sbin/init.d/nfs.client stop
killing nfs4cbd
# /sbin/init.d/nfs.client start
Starting NFS CLIENT subsystem
Starting up nfs4cbd daemon
/usr/sbin/nfs4cbd
Starting up nfsmapid daemon
Mounting remote NFS file systems ...
mount: qarhl25:/apps/bi on /apps/bi - WARNING unknown option "delaylog"
Mounting remote CacheFS file systems ...