HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- kernel build foo
Operating System - HP-UX
1833870
Members
1582
Online
110063
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-20-2005 03:48 AM
07-20-2005 03:48 AM
When I tried to rebuild a new kernel with
sam when changing the parm semume and setting
it to a recommended value perscribed by
PeopleSoft:
SEMUME Same as SEMMNS semune <= semmns
semmns is equal to 8192. So tried 8192 for
semume.
The kernel get built smaller than the original
and hangs on bootup.
So I set semume from the default of 10 to 512
and the kernel builds.
Size of good and bad kernels:
18556184 vmunix.bad
27983672 vmunix.prev - Had to boot with this
to get back in.
Now I noticed that when changing some Dynamic
parms that do not require a reboot. The kernel
vmunix has gone down in size to 18556184.
I thought I had copied the vmunix.prev, after
booting up, to vmunix. ?? Copied it back again.
Anyway. I am trying to build a new kernel
with the change to maxssiz set to the
allowable max 98048:
from sysdef:
maxssiz 32768 - 0-98048
98048 x 4 x 1024 = 401604608
The kernel vmunix_test in /stand/build is small again:
18556208 vmunix_test
Which leads me to believe that it is not bootable either.
Aborted out of sam "replace and reboot" choice.
What is going on here?? By changing kernel
parms. Is it possible to have a smaller kernel
that is correct and bootable??
I have had to make several changes for oracle
9.2.0 and peoplesoft 8.44. Although I first
used the recommended kernel requirements for
oracle 10g application server. Which are high.
Inclosing current kernel parms.
sam when changing the parm semume and setting
it to a recommended value perscribed by
PeopleSoft:
SEMUME Same as SEMMNS semune <= semmns
semmns is equal to 8192. So tried 8192 for
semume.
The kernel get built smaller than the original
and hangs on bootup.
So I set semume from the default of 10 to 512
and the kernel builds.
Size of good and bad kernels:
18556184 vmunix.bad
27983672 vmunix.prev - Had to boot with this
to get back in.
Now I noticed that when changing some Dynamic
parms that do not require a reboot. The kernel
vmunix has gone down in size to 18556184.
I thought I had copied the vmunix.prev, after
booting up, to vmunix. ?? Copied it back again.
Anyway. I am trying to build a new kernel
with the change to maxssiz set to the
allowable max 98048:
from sysdef:
maxssiz 32768 - 0-98048
98048 x 4 x 1024 = 401604608
The kernel vmunix_test in /stand/build is small again:
18556208 vmunix_test
Which leads me to believe that it is not bootable either.
Aborted out of sam "replace and reboot" choice.
What is going on here?? By changing kernel
parms. Is it possible to have a smaller kernel
that is correct and bootable??
I have had to make several changes for oracle
9.2.0 and peoplesoft 8.44. Although I first
used the recommended kernel requirements for
oracle 10g application server. Which are high.
Inclosing current kernel parms.
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-20-2005 05:16 AM
07-20-2005 05:16 AM
Solution
If you do a dynamic change, you can use kmtune to save the make it permanent in the system file.
The oracle requiements must be met or the 10g Application server, which I've installed won't install.
You can reduce certain parameters and still be bootable, but remember, Uncle Oracle is hungry and needs a lot of resources.
SEP
The oracle requiements must be met or the 10g Application server, which I've installed won't install.
You can reduce certain parameters and still be bootable, but remember, Uncle Oracle is hungry and needs a lot of resources.
SEP
Steven E Protter
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-20-2005 05:24 AM
07-20-2005 05:24 AM
Re: kernel build foo
That's fine.
But what about the problem?
But what about the problem?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-20-2005 04:14 PM
07-20-2005 04:14 PM
Re: kernel build foo
Hi Jerry
Please refer to following paragraph from HP Doc site, where there is recommendation to change all related parameters at the SAMETIME
http://docs.hp.com/en/B3921-90010/semmns.5.html
What Other Tunable Values Should Be Changed at the Same Time?
All the System V semaphore tunables are interrelated and should not be treated as independent variables. The tunables must be evaluated as a system to ensure they reflect the application requirements. The sema tunables include semaem, semmap, semmni, semmns, semmnu, semmsl, semume, semvmx, and sysv_hash_locks. Typically, a change in the semmns tunable does not require changes to other tunables.
Regards
Mahesh
Please refer to following paragraph from HP Doc site, where there is recommendation to change all related parameters at the SAMETIME
http://docs.hp.com/en/B3921-90010/semmns.5.html
What Other Tunable Values Should Be Changed at the Same Time?
All the System V semaphore tunables are interrelated and should not be treated as independent variables. The tunables must be evaluated as a system to ensure they reflect the application requirements. The sema tunables include semaem, semmap, semmni, semmns, semmnu, semmsl, semume, semvmx, and sysv_hash_locks. Typically, a change in the semmns tunable does not require changes to other tunables.
Regards
Mahesh
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP