- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Kernel tunning
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2003 07:49 AM
06-13-2003 07:49 AM
Kernel tunning
In HP-UX 11.0 we are trying to load a file (60Mb) into a dynamic memory table, when the loading proccess have reached 25Mb the proccess go down with the following message error:
Fatal error: 9010 - Out of memory; cannot claim more; total segmented
memory claimed.
We suppose that this issue is involving a kernel tunning due to we have noticed that maxssiz and maxssiz_64bit looks lower to satisfy our requirements (Pls find attached a copy of our current kernel conf).
I'll appreciate your comments and recomendations about.
Regards.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2003 07:56 AM
06-13-2003 07:56 AM
Re: Kernel tunning
Later,
Bill
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2003 07:57 AM
06-13-2003 07:57 AM
Re: Kernel tunning
Your kernel parms look a little low, but high enough to allow this.
Is it possible that this is a 32-bit application? Limiter could be contigous memory.
You could not have enough in one chunk to load this.
Check your shared memory with
ipcs -mob
HTH,
Jeff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2003 07:59 AM
06-13-2003 07:59 AM
Re: Kernel tunning
Performance Tuning doc
http://www1.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/search.do?category=c0&docType=Security&docType=Patch&docType=EngineerNotes&docType=BugReports&docType=Hardware&docType=ReferenceMaterials&docType=ThirdParty&searchString=UPERFKBAN00000726&mode=id&admit=-682735245+1053636168960+28353475&searchCrit=allwords&printable=true
I know the author who deals with Oracle performance issues at the support center. He is the top of the field.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2003 08:03 AM
06-13-2003 08:03 AM
Re: Kernel tunning
It looks like your default maxdsize may be too low (64MB). You can use SAM to rebuild your kernel with a larger value and retry your app.
Also, what size chunks are you allocating memory in?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2003 08:10 AM
06-13-2003 08:10 AM
Re: Kernel tunning
I've read the Configurable Kernel Parameters white paper before this consult, thanks.
Development team have to certify me n-bit application, and our shared memory are in attached doc.
Rgds.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2003 08:15 AM
06-13-2003 08:15 AM
Re: Kernel tunning
Try to work with SAM for rebuild the kernel
there you will have some info about every
parameter that you can change.
I think you should change the maxdsiz
the one that is write to your OS 32/64bit
check that you change the wright.
Caesar
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2003 08:31 AM
06-13-2003 08:31 AM
Re: Kernel tunning
Well seeing that shared memory output, I still believe that 32-bit shared memory exhaustion or fragmentation could be the culprit here.
You've got several processes in there that are large users.
Is this 11.0/32 or 11.0/64. If it's a K-class or lower it could be a 32-bit OS. If it's an L-class or higher it's definitely 64-bit. But even if the OS is 64-bit, the application could still be 32-bit & could be the culprit.
If so, then you'll need to run memory windows.
See /usr/share/doc/mem_wndws.txt for the whitepaper on how to implement & use memory windows.
HTH,
Jeff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-16-2003 06:20 AM
06-16-2003 06:20 AM
Re: Kernel tunning
This is a L-Class machine under HP-UX 64, and the application is a 32-bit code. Also we have Sybase 11.03 and 12 engines running inside the box in 64-bit modes. Would the activation of this feature impact exclusively to those of 32-bit or both? Do risks exist on those of 64-bit?
Regards,