- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Lesser evil: pageouts or cache miss?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-22-2003 09:26 PM
06-22-2003 09:26 PM
If I resolve/reduce a pageout problem by reducing my buffer cache from 1G (of 3.75) to 400M, I'm likely to increase buffer cache misses which may result in increased phys IOs downstream. Haven't I just relocated the phys IO and made nil net gain?
Or is there some overhead to PAGEOUTs which makes them an order of magnitude worse than a buffer cache miss?
Thanks in advance
Dan
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-22-2003 11:19 PM
06-22-2003 11:19 PM
Re: Lesser evil: pageouts or cache miss?
if you go short on memory , you risk that processes are competing for memory. This means that your pages won't only get paged out once , but you will constantly page in and out pages, because processe will try to access pages that is paged out, and vhand will struggle to find pages to page out again because you are low on free mem. This is called trashing , and you may not be able to log into your system. (Because all resource are used on paging in/out)
Low BC hit rate will give you lower i/o performance towards filesystems and block-devices, but won't put your system in a trashing state.
RGds Jarle
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-23-2003 01:26 AM
06-23-2003 01:26 AM
Re: Lesser evil: pageouts or cache miss?
* The buffer cache is for caching of files that reside on disk anyway. A process wanting to read a file generally expects to cost a physical IO.
* A pageout is a page of virtual memory being written out to disk. Next time the process wants to access that particular part of memory it will result in another disk access. That is definitely an order of magnitude worse than a disk access for a file read!
Keeping cached file data in memory at the expense of virtual memory pages doesn't really make a lot of sense to me. 1Gig is a very large buffer cache, reducing it to 400Meg would be a wise idea.
Just my ??0.02
Regards,
Steve
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-23-2003 01:30 AM
06-23-2003 01:30 AM
Re: Lesser evil: pageouts or cache miss?
Our main goal on all our large servers is;
Keep some Ram free (ie. NO pageouts). We never let them run out of ram due to the drastic decrease in performance that would result.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-23-2003 03:09 AM
06-23-2003 03:09 AM
Re: Lesser evil: pageouts or cache miss?
Anyone else add technical reasoning to..
"Why are pageouts so much more crippling than cache misses?"
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-23-2003 04:29 AM
06-23-2003 04:29 AM
SolutionThis is difficult to explain in a short answer but let me try.
Pageouts and indicative of memory exhaustion. This then causes the OS to pageout processes from memory to disk at a high priority, causing heavy I/O on the swap areas (usually system disks). In time all processes are accessed in a round robin fashion, which means periodically all paged processes must be paged back into memory (again, this runs at a high priority and uses heavy I/O on swap areas). If memory is still exhausted processes must again be paged back to disk. And so it continues.
Basically it causes your server to thrash. This is what causes the large performance drop.
Basically, pageouts indicate memory bottlenecks of which the major ones are;
- Saturation of memory
- A large VM queue
- Resource starvation
- user dissatisfication with response time
And straight from the HP-UX Performance Tuning book, the solution to memory bottlenecks is (in order);
- on small systems reduce the size of the kernel
- carefully reduce the size of the fixed buffer cache
- use dynamic buffer cache and tune if carefully
- reduce the use of memory locking
- etc.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-23-2003 02:52 PM
06-23-2003 02:52 PM
Re: Lesser evil: pageouts or cache miss?
Dan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-23-2003 03:00 PM
06-23-2003 03:00 PM
Re: Lesser evil: pageouts or cache miss?
(* didn't we just do this two days ago and obtain the .... *)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-23-2003 05:10 PM
06-23-2003 05:10 PM
Re: Lesser evil: pageouts or cache miss?
//
Many thanks for the feedback.
Anyone else add technical reasoning to..
"Why are pageouts so much more crippling than cache misses?"
//
In fact you posted this question multiple times on that day and here are more responses to one of those threads on the same subject.
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0xd05b0ea029a2d711abdc0090277a778c,00.html
-Sri