- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: make_recovery failure
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-12-2003 08:16 AM
05-12-2003 08:16 AM
I amended a scripted make_recovery command by making it a no-rewind device. The command subsequently failed as it added an extra n to the device.
I have now discovered that / has filled up to 100% used.
What , besides a lot of /dev tun* devices , do I need to delete to get back to the normal 76% ??
The error was:
make_recover(472):/usr/bin/dd failed,res-512,errno=9
Thanks
Cliff
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-12-2003 08:27 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-12-2003 09:11 AM
05-12-2003 09:11 AM
Re: make_recovery failure
What this is are files hidden by a mounted filesystem.
Lets say you store a 50 Meg download on a folder called /download, which is part of the root fs.
You decide later to have a mounted filesystem called /download and you mount /download
That 50 Megabyte download is still there but it doesn't show up on an ls -la
Its takeing up 50 Meg on root and its invisible.
In order to clean this out, you have to umount /download and delete it.
I had a system that failed to mount the /var filesystem at boot one day. Some logs continued to get written in the root fs.
The machine was booted again and sucessfully mounted /var
I kept wondering why root was so full, until I went into single user mode and ran the command in post 1.
Just a little extra to think about.
Good Luck,
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-12-2003 09:19 AM
05-12-2003 09:19 AM
Re: make_recovery failure
you could start looking for the non-existing device file, the one with the extra "n" appended; this file probably exists now and holds a lot of useless data.
Just a guess....
regards,
John K.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-12-2003 10:12 AM
05-12-2003 10:12 AM
Re: make_recovery failure
find . -type f -size +1000
file isn't a valid type on 11.00 f means file.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-12-2003 11:40 AM
05-12-2003 11:40 AM
Re: make_recovery failure
if you can remember when the ignite session ran, then try searching for files that have changed since - not that this will pin-point only a few "guilty" files, as many files have been written in the meantime, but you could give it a try.
Example:
If the backup was created May 11, 2003 at 12:15 hours, create this file:
# touch -t 0305111215 /tmp/fupfile
Then search for files in the root directory changed after that time and display their sizes:
# find / -xdev -newer /tmp/fupfile -exec ls -l {} \;
As mentioned, you will see a lot of files, but some of them must be relevant.
regards,
John K.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-14-2003 01:55 AM
05-14-2003 01:55 AM
Re: make_recovery failure
Thanks again
Cliff