- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- MC/SG thinks root VG is a clustered VG!!
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-09-2001 10:52 PM
06-09-2001 10:52 PM
MC/SG thinks root VG is a clustered VG!!
root@pfs1:[/etc/cmcluster]# cmcheckconf -C /etc/cmcluster/pfs1_clust.conf
Begin cluster verification...
Error: Volume group /dev/vg00 is configured differently on node pfs1 than on node pfs1b
Error: Volume group /dev/vg00 on node pfs1b does not appear to have a physical volume corresponding to /dev/dsk/c1t6d0 on node pfs1 (617329303966546317).
Error: Volume group /dev/vg00 on node pfs1b does not appear to have a physical volume corresponding to /dev/dsk/c2t6d0 on node pfs1 (617329303990878847).
Error: Volume group /dev/vg00 is configured differently on node pfs1b than on node pfs1
Error: Volume group /dev/vg00 on node pfs1 does not appear to have a physical volume corresponding to /dev/dsk/c1t6d0 on node pfs1b (608329393992142354).
Error: Volume group /dev/vg00 on node pfs1 does not appear to have a physical volume corresponding to /dev/dsk/c2t6d0 on node pfs1b (608329393992142352).
Warning: The volume group /dev/vg00 is activated on more than one node:
pfs1
pfs1b
Warning: Volume groups should not be activated on more than one node.
Use vgchange(1m) to de-activate a volume group on a node.
cmcheckconf : Unable to reconcile configuration file /etc/cmcluster/pfs1_clust.conf
with discovered configuration information.
I've never seen this. Help.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-10-2001 02:50 AM
06-10-2001 02:50 AM
Re: MC/SG thinks root VG is a clustered VG!!
What we often see (and do not support) is that customers clone their disks with tools like dd(1m) or with copyutil (in the offline diagnostic). Also cloned disks created by hardware mirroring (e.g. EMC BCVs) are often seen. The common scenario is then that the LVM header is the same on the boot disks, thus confusing SG as the VGID is now the same.
The only way to get rid of this, is to change the VGID of one of the VGs by doing the following:
- boot one machine to maintenance mode (hpux -lm)
- vgchgid -f /dev/dsk/
(include all disks of vg00 in this command, -f (force) option is undocumented)
- vgexport vg00
- mkdir /dev/vg00
- mknod /dev/vg00/group c 64 0x0
- vgimport /dev/vg00 /dev/dsk/... /dev/dsk/..
- reboot
If the above scenario does NOT describe your situation, you may want to check the following:
- Has the /etc/lvmtab been copied from one node to the other?
In this case you should also follow the same procedure above (vgexport/vgimport in maintenance mode), but NOT run vgchgid (since only the lvmtab contains the wrong VGID, but the LVM header of the disks is ok)
- For specific diskarrays (e.g. Nike diskarray) SG checks the serial number. The serial numbers must be different. This can be checked by your h/w support. If the serial numbers of two diskarrays are the same, it can have a similar effect.
Carsten
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. -- HhGttG
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-10-2001 10:26 AM
06-10-2001 10:26 AM
Re: MC/SG thinks root VG is a clustered VG!!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-17-2001 12:19 AM
07-17-2001 12:19 AM
Re: MC/SG thinks root VG is a clustered VG!!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-17-2001 12:26 AM
07-17-2001 12:26 AM
Re: MC/SG thinks root VG is a clustered VG!!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-16-2003 02:47 AM
10-16-2003 02:47 AM
Re: MC/SG thinks root VG is a clustered VG!!
- boot to lvm maintenance mode (hpux -lm)
- vgexport vg00 (do this 1st or vgchgid fails!)
- vgchgid -f /dev/rdsk/
(list all disks in vg in one command)
- mkdir/mknod vg00 files
- vgimport vg00
then, you need to do the lvlnboot commands on the /, /stand, and swap lv's:
- lvlnboot -b /dev/vg00/lvol# (/stand lv)
- lvlnboot -r /dev/vg00/lvol# (/ lv)
- lvlnboot -s /dev/vg00/lvol# (swap lv)
- lvlnboot -d /dev/vg00/lvol# (swap lv)
- lvlnboot -R /dev/vg00
- lvlnboot -v /dev/vg00
- mount /dev/vg00/lvol# /usr (mount /usr)
- lifcp /dev/rdsk/c1t6d0:AUTO - (confirm 'hpux' is listed)
Then reboot. worked for me - YMMV.
Regards,
Chuck Davis