- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Me again! Tape drive device names this time
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-24-2007 01:56 AM
08-24-2007 01:56 AM
On a couple of our servers, mainky 11.23 PA RISC when we reboot the server the /dev/rmt/0mn number change even though there have been NO changes to the device hardware paths.
These are fibre attached Ultrium 2 drived connected via an EMC Brocade fibre switch.
before the boot hey would be /dev/rmt/1mn, 2mn, 3mn and 4,n, then after a reboot they go to 5mn, 6md, 7mn and 8mn!
So we update the drive congig in data protector then the next time the server is booted they switch back again, or maybe they dont, but sooner or later they do.
Its causing no end of problems and Data protector leves tapes on the drives and fails to write data to them.
Can we stop this and force them to be stating by having a /dev/rmt/drive1, drive2 etc? I noce the minor number changes so I dont think this is possible.
they are IBM drives so we are using the latest atdd driver which riungs an /sbin/init.d script on server boot. could this be to blame?
ta
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-24-2007 01:58 AM
08-24-2007 01:58 AM
Re: Me again! Tape drive device names this time
Pete
Pete
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-24-2007 02:02 AM
08-24-2007 02:02 AM
Re: Me again! Tape drive device names this time
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-24-2007 02:10 AM
08-24-2007 02:10 AM
Re: Me again! Tape drive device names this time
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-24-2007 07:21 AM
08-24-2007 07:21 AM
Re: Me again! Tape drive device names this time
We had the same problem. what we did was use the device files with the /dev/rmt/c5t3d0BESTnb and moved away from the /dev/rmt/31m and that seem to fix the problem. I'm not really sure why that fixed the problem however.
Hope that helps!
sp,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-27-2007 11:25 PM
08-27-2007 11:25 PM
Re: Me again! Tape drive device names this time
I'll try a reboot and give it a go.
thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-27-2007 11:37 PM
08-27-2007 11:37 PM
Re: Me again! Tape drive device names this time
Rgrds,
Rita
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-27-2007 11:39 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-28-2007 05:21 AM
08-28-2007 05:21 AM
Re: Me again! Tape drive device names this time
Do you have 'before and after' examples of the hardware path?
Also can you confirm exactly how the tape drives/tape library are attached? (direct fibre tapes, or through a FC/SCSI bridge of some sort?) and what mode the tape library and drives are?
Sorry to worry you, but for another tale of woe with IBM SAN attached tape drives see here:
http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1042526
This never got fixed!
Incidentally we never seem to have these kind of problems with HP tape drives!
HTH
Duncan
I am an HPE Employee
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-28-2007 09:53 PM
08-28-2007 09:53 PM
Re: Me again! Tape drive device names this time
The server models bvary but the one I'm trying to resolve this on (because its easier to tge a reboot slot!) is an RP4440 running 11.23 on PA-RISC. It has a fibre connection to a 32 port EMC brocade fibre switch where it can see 4 fibre IBM ultrium 2 drives which are housed in a StorageTek L700.
The harware and infrastructure has not been changed for a while and we never used to have this problem. However with the introduction of 11.23 and hence a newer version of the IBM atdd driver this started to happen. This is a dev environment but we are also having this problem in our live/production environments which siimilart setup.
The server I am testing on is down today with a boot disk failure. Once its back I'll test some more with some reboots and try and get a before & after view for you.
thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-28-2007 10:01 PM
08-28-2007 10:01 PM
Re: Me again! Tape drive device names this time
How about the hardware path to the drives?
Is something different here?
Maybe it is mapped to another LUN or something. This may cause the OS to "think" it is a new device and it will create new device files.
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-28-2007 10:53 PM
08-28-2007 10:53 PM
Re: Me again! Tape drive device names this time
The good news is it looks like the 'BEST' device name remains unchanged.
File attached...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-28-2007 11:02 PM
08-28-2007 11:02 PM
Re: Me again! Tape drive device names this time
I never seen this with the original HP-UX tape driver (stape), but I guess you are using another.
Ask the driver vendor!
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-28-2007 11:48 PM
08-28-2007 11:48 PM
Re: Me again! Tape drive device names this time
Ive now done an additional test which seems to have stopped the flipping - I have removed the link in /sbin/rc2.d to the atdd script for server boot. After this the drives do not change any more.
Looking at this script it seems to be doing the IBM/atdd equivelant of an insf -e etc to rediscover the drives on each server boot. THis is not necessary unless you add new drives in which case you can run the command manualy. I dont see any need for it to be run on each boot.