- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- missing 57 MB from / file system
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-21-1999 12:54 AM
12-21-1999 12:54 AM
missing 57 MB from / file system
system. Both df and fsck report that 73 MB are in use, but du reports that
only 17 MB are in use.
There is no swap configured on this logical volume. I tried booting into
single-user mode and fsck still said that 73 MB are in use. The open source
lsof tool only showed two files open, namely the executable files for init and
sh.
Where is the missing 56 MB? I need additional space to install Y2K patches.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-21-1999 08:21 AM
12-21-1999 08:21 AM
Re: missing 57 MB from / file system
Do the following
du -s .
du -sk .
df .
df -k .
bdf .
you will get varying results but df -k . and bdf . should give you the same
results.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-21-1999 11:52 PM
12-21-1999 11:52 PM
Re: missing 57 MB from / file system
what I see:
# du -s -x -k /
17748 /
# bdf /
Filesystem kbytes used avail %used Mounted on
/dev/vg00/lvol3 83733 74889 470 99% /
Compare the "used" amount from bdf with the amount shown by du.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-26-1999 07:14 PM
12-26-1999 07:14 PM
Re: missing 57 MB from / file system
I've encountered such problem quite a few days ago.
I also suspected an incorrect state of filesystem, because "df /" showed that
99% is used, but
"du -ks /*" showed no such big directories in a root filesystem.
The answer is:
If you use CDE , then you have /.dt/Trash folder. And all files that you've
deleted working with desktop were moved there.
In my case my /.dt/Trash folder was approximately 60 MB.
To check it you can issue "du -sk /.[a-z,A-Z,0-9]*" command.
Best regards,
Vassily
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-05-2000 02:37 AM
01-05-2000 02:37 AM
Re: missing 57 MB from / file system
the Y2K pacthes.
Someone had copied a large (56 MB) file into a directory which was used as an
NFS mount point. The disk space was used, but the file was not reachable by du
or other tools which traverse the directory structure. This probably happened
at a time when the remote machine was down, since this filesystem is ordinarily
mounted all the time.
I discoverd this when I went into single user mode again and did the du from
there. The disk usage reported by du then matched that reported by fsck.