- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- MWA vs vmstat
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-15-2007 01:08 AM
05-15-2007 01:08 AM
MWA vs vmstat
Question on vmstat, and Measureware performance
metrics on HP-UX 11.11 Superdome.
I am seeing a very large discrepancy between vmstat blocked jobs and MWA.
Using both tools to look at performance metrics vmstat on a 5 minute sample shows 'b' column values > 10 over a period of 4 hours.
The equivalent column in MWA GBL_DISK_SUBSYSTEM_QUEUE (I believe) shows values of 0 over the same 4 hour period.
I realise that underneath the hood they are both very different (KI vs pstat), and general conclusion is KI is more accurate ... but I would'nt have expected to see such a huge discrepancy.
Can anyone explain why there would be such a difference ? i.e What have I missed/mis understood ?
Thanks for all/any help
John
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-15-2007 01:20 AM
05-15-2007 01:20 AM
Re: MWA vs vmstat
Whereas the GBL_DISK_SUBSYSTEM_QUEUE is only for the disk I/O subsystem.
As an example, the GBL_DISK_SUBSYSTEM_QUEUE values can be low, while the APP_DISK_SUBSYSTEM_WAIT_PCT values can be high. In this case, there are many processes on the system, but there are only a very small number of processes in the specific application that is being examined and there is a high percentage of those few processes that are blocked on the disk
I/O subsystem.
I got that from:
http://ovweb.external.hp.com/ovnsmdps/pdf/ovpa450_hpux_dict_perf_metrics.txt
Maybe some of that will help.
Rgds...Geoff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-18-2007 12:00 AM
05-18-2007 12:00 AM
Re: MWA vs vmstat
Still am unsure though whats causing this
discrepancy though.
Does anyone know what the equivalent
parameter(s) in Measureware are for the
vmstat "b" column ?
Thanks
John
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-18-2007 12:01 AM
05-18-2007 12:01 AM
Re: MWA vs vmstat
Meaurement discrepencies come from how the tools were written and how often the data is collected.
Its also possible there is a bug. Is the system patched up to date?
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-18-2007 01:05 AM
05-18-2007 01:05 AM
Re: MWA vs vmstat
As Geoff suggests they are measuring different things, there is no direct mwa equivalent that I know of .
MWA splits things down in to different measures so that you tell indvidual components apart and identify which ones need attention .
the b column in vmstat simply lists all the processes that can't be put on the run queue for an i/o related reason including disk i/o tape i/o paging and I think things like NFS lan and terminal
have a look a the B page in glance to get an idea of the things your system is waiting for.
Mike
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-18-2007 02:25 AM
05-18-2007 02:25 AM
Re: MWA vs vmstat
Thanks everyone. I realise both tools are very different underneath the hood. I guess I was just trying to understand why on the face of it the "b" column in vmstat indicated a possible issue but we're not seeing any indication of an issue in MWA data.
I will explore Patch level to make sure nothing was missed here.
Once again, thats for all your help
I'll post anything I find out ..
John