Operating System - HP-UX
1831635 Members
1714 Online
110027 Solutions
New Discussion

Network tuning (challenge, at least for me)

 
SOLVED
Go to solution
Manuel Urena
Advisor

Network tuning (challenge, at least for me)

Hi all,

Let me explain you my scenario.

Two unix servers (one sunfire v120, the other an hp N4000-55 box).

Both interfaces configured as fast ethernet.

This is the lanadmin output in the hp box:

LAN INTERFACE STATUS DISPLAY
Wed, Oct 4,2006 10:45:03

PPA Number = 0
Description = lan0 HP PCI 10/100Base-TX Core [100BASE-TX,HD,AUTO,TT=1500]
Type (value) = ethernet-csmacd(6)
MTU Size = 1500
Speed = 100000000
Station Address = 0x306e03d801
Administration Status (value) = up(1)
Operation Status (value) = up(1)
Last Change = 18581897
Inbound Octets = 555962
Inbound Unicast Packets = 9245
Inbound Non-Unicast Packets = 0
Inbound Discards = 0
Inbound Errors = 0
Inbound Unknown Protocols = 0
Outbound Octets = 18698982
Outbound Unicast Packets = 21749
Outbound Non-Unicast Packets = 1
Outbound Discards = 0
Outbound Errors = 0
Outbound Queue Length = 0
Specific = 655367

Ethernet-like Statistics Group

Index = 1
Alignment Errors = 0
FCS Errors = 0
Single Collision Frames = 2
Multiple Collision Frames = 0
Deferred Transmissions = 2
Late Collisions = 1670
Excessive Collisions = 0
Internal MAC Transmit Errors = 0
Carrier Sense Errors = 0
Frames Too Long = 0
Internal MAC Receive Errors = 0

Below the netstat -ni of the HP BOX:

root# netstat -ni
Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll
lan0 1500 172.16.1.0 172.16.1.49 8499922 0 3996083 0 2
lo0 4136 127.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 25321 0 25321 0 0


SUN BOX:
root# netstat -ni
Name Mtu Net/Dest Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Collis Queue
lo0 8232 127.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 73 0 73 0 0 0
eri0 1500 10.10.71.0 10.10.71.74 187927 0 1630 1 0 0
eri1 1500 172.16.1.0 172.16.1.31 40841 3253 22382 5 0 0

root# ndd /dev/eri instance
1

root# ndd /dev/eri link_status
1

root# ndd /dev/eri link_mode
1

root# ndd /dev/eri link_speed
1


I am utilizing ttcp (I've attached the source of this classic tool)

SUN BOX:
root# ~/UXTools/ttcp.sun4 -r -s -l1500
ttcp-r: nbuf=1024, buflen=1500, port=2000
ttcp-r: socket
ttcp-r: accept
ttcp-r: 0.0user 0.1sys 10:38real 0% 0i+0d 0maxrss 0+0pf 6755+24csw
ttcp-r: 15000000 bytes processed
ttcp-r: 0.12 CPU sec = 122070 KB/cpu sec, 976562 Kbits/cpu sec
ttcp-r: 638.645 real sec = 22.9367 KB/real sec, 183.494 Kbits/sec


HP BOX:

root# ./ttcp -t -s -l1500 -n10000 sundev
ttcp-t: nbuf=10000, buflen=1500, port=2000
ttcp-t: socket
ttcp-t: connect
ttcp-t: 0.0user 0.1sys 10:37real 0% 0i+0d 0maxrss 0+0pf 555+2csw
ttcp-t: 15000000 bytes processed
ttcp-t: 0.16 CPU sec = 91552.7 KB/cpu sec, 732422 Kbits/cpu sec
ttcp-t: 637.405 real sec = 22.9814 KB/real sec, 183.851 Kbits/sec


As you seen the throughput is extremely slow for servers talking via a crossover cable under fast ethernet!

If anybody could find what could be wrong, please tell me. I am almost frustrated with this.

Is there any parameters I should tweak with?

Thanks a lot in advance,

Manuel
8 REPLIES 8
spex
Honored Contributor

Re: Network tuning (challenge, at least for me)

Hi Manuel,

> [100BASE-TX,HD,AUTO,TT=1500]

You might want to start by setting lan0 to full duplex, and making sure eri1 on the v120 is set to the same.

PCS
rick jones
Honored Contributor
Solution

Re: Network tuning (challenge, at least for me)

That the lanadmin shows the NIC was autoneg, half-duplex, and experiencing _late_ collisions suggests that the other end of the link was improperly (IMO) hardcoded. set the other end of the link to autoneg and things should be much better - modulo the wimpy nature of a V210 :)

$ cat usenet_replies/duplex
How 100Base-T Autoneg is supposed to work:

When both sides of the link are set to autoneg, they will "negotiate"
the duplex setting and select full-duplex if both sides can do
full-duplex.

If one side is hardcoded and not using autoneg, the autoneg process
will "fail" and the side trying to autoneg is required by spec to use
half-duplex mode.

If one side is using half-duplex, and the other is using full-duplex,
sorrow and woe is the usual result.

So, the following table shows what will happen given various settings
on each side:

Auto Half Full

Auto Happiness Lucky Sorrow

Half Lucky Happiness Sorrow

Full Sorrow Sorrow Happiness

Happiness means that there is a good shot of everything going well.
Lucky means that things will likely go well, but not because you did
anything correctly :) Sorrow means that there _will_ be a duplex
mis-match.

When there is a duplex mismatch, on the side running half-duplex you
will see various errors and probably a number of _LATE_ collisions
("normal" collisions don't count here). On the side running
full-duplex you will see things like FCS errors. Note that those
errors are not necessarily conclusive, they are simply indicators.

Further, it is important to keep in mind that a "clean" ping (or the
like - eg "linkloop" or default netperf TCP_RR) test result is
inconclusive here - a duplex mismatch causes lost traffic _only_ when
both sides of the link try to speak at the same time. A typical ping
test, being synchronous, one at a time request/response, never tries
to have both sides talking at the same time.

Finally, when/if you migrate to 1000Base-T, everything has to be set
to auto-neg anyway.
there is no rest for the wicked yet the virtuous have no pillows
Manuel Urena
Advisor

Re: Network tuning (challenge, at least for me)

Thank you so much PCS and Rick.

Rick thank you so much for your insightful and detail explanation.

I still have a question I may know how to tweak the NIC parameters on the SUN box. (Utilizing ndd /dev/eri) But I don't know how to do this on HP-UX.

Could you guys please tell me how to change the parameter (HD/FD, AUTONEG, etc...) with lan0?

Thanks a lot.

Manuel
Manuel Urena
Advisor

Re: Network tuning (challenge, at least for me)

Hi again,

In my previous posting ( Could you guys please tell me how to change the parameters (HD/FD, AUTONEG, etc...) with lan0? )

I forgot to specify that I would like to know both things
-How to make these changes dynamically (i.e. w/o rebooting machine) and also save my changes making them persistent after a reboot.

Thanks a lot,

Manuel



IT_2007
Honored Contributor

Re: Network tuning (challenge, at least for me)

you can change setting dynamically but you it says network problems for 11seconds..

lanadmin -x 0

which will show details for lan0

lanadmin -X 100FD 0

which will set lan0 with 100 Full Duplex auto off.

you can set these permanent by adding proper values in files /etc/rc.config.d

hpbtlanconf
hpetherlanconf
hpigelanconf

Use vi editor to edit the above files. But you need to edit only one whichever LAN card you are using it.
rick jones
Honored Contributor

Re: Network tuning (challenge, at least for me)

Since the HP-UX box is already set to autoneg, there is nothing for you to change there. What you need to change is the other end of the cable - either the v210 if they are back to back, or your switch port - to be autoneg.
there is no rest for the wicked yet the virtuous have no pillows
Manuel Urena
Advisor

Re: Network tuning (challenge, at least for me)

Rick,

I just did as you said, and now everything looks normal.

By the way this is what I did on the sun box:

ndd -set /dev/eri instance 1
ndd -set /dev/eri adv_autoneg_cap 1

I asked the question of how to configure lan0 parameters/settings (both dynamically and saving the changes permanently) because I suspect I will have to tweak with other lan interfaces on other hp-ux machines.

Thanks a lot Rick. And thanks much also to everybody who took their time to help me with this issue.

Manuel
Kevin Wright
Honored Contributor

Re: Network tuning (challenge, at least for me)

I would suggest you hardcode each card to FD.