- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- OmniBack Cell Manager
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-13-2001 07:20 AM
03-13-2001 07:20 AM
I currently have an OmniBack cell on HP/UX which is getting to it's maximum size. I'm going to split it into 2 cells handled by MoM.
My intention is to buy a Cell Manager for NT, and move some of the cells over to there for management.
My question is, given that the Cell Manager for NT is 1/4 the price of the same for UNIX, is it limited in any way, or is it just as capable provided the hardware is up to it?
Also, any official word on release 4.0? I suspect this might solve the problem because this is more efficient than 3.5 for database size, but I need to expand its use like now!
Cheers
Sy
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-13-2001 08:34 AM
03-13-2001 08:34 AM
SolutionAnyway, I moved a Cell Server from UNIX to NT, then had to move it back to a different UNIX box. The big problem was performance, the second problem was that it would fail on host lookups about half the time.
I called HP about this, but because there is no nsswitch, or way to define how hosts are resolved, there are loads and gobs of problems. I even made winnt\system32\drivers\etc\hosts and included all my hosts their, and that did not work.
the MS mentality is to use WINS (even craptive directory prefers to issue WINS lookups over strict DNS to any request). So this way, if it's internal you never know what the helk your gonna get!
Needless to say since performance of DISK->TAPE was less than 50% what it was on UNIX even for windows clients, and the backup's only working 50% of the time, I put it back on UNIX!
For size problems, I would recommend (you may have already done this) you write-ascii then read-ascii on the OBII server to remove junk on the logs. I am usually doing this bi-monthly and have allocated 8 GB for Index and database, and backing up about 1/2TB every month. Anually, I archive the full database, and start over.
Regards,
Shannon
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-13-2001 09:48 AM
03-13-2001 09:48 AM
Re: OmniBack Cell Manager
I agree that it usually comes down to database management. Purge old records. Check your retention times and your log level. Many people seem to configure backups to report at the Warning level. That just helps to fill the database. Setting that to Major is usually adequate. I inherited my database and many weekly jobs were set with permament protection. Then the tapes would would later be reinitialized and the database kept those useless records.
Before going as far as MoM I would look at database maintenance.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-13-2001 10:25 AM
03-13-2001 10:25 AM
Re: OmniBack Cell Manager
Hello Simon,
If your Omniback is cell_server HP-UX or NT
you do not have limitation.For omniback is it indifferent.
The size for your database is the same for example.
But.....
When you perform backup in NT system you cannot backup up files in look for another aplication,so if the system are using other
process to the same file that you want backup up,you can have much more time for backup.
Other....
If you have much NT system for backup you can have OFM (Open file Manager).
HP has one omniback that work with OFM special to NT system.
Clovis Borges.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-14-2001 01:35 AM
03-14-2001 01:35 AM
Re: OmniBack Cell Manager
I'm surprised at the 16Gb database size you speak of - I thought the physical limit was 8Gb? Ours is currently about 6.5Gb, and the problem is that to do an ASCII export/import would take a good weekend to complete, so we can't do it regularly (in fact haven't yet).
I also don't think this'll shrink the database usage too much because the vast majority of it is file versions, and I already purge this extensively.
Problem is too that we have a business requirement to backup Oracle archive logs to tape every 15 minutes, and 48 hours of backup downtime doesn't help this! And where do you keep 48 hours of OLTP archlogs!!!
I think I'll not bother with NT, because we already get random backup failures with our current UNIX machine, so we're moving the database to a bigger server.
We backup about 8 UNIX servers and 30 NT servers, totalling about 2 million file versions per night! We only just manage to keep up to it with the purge, because the backup window is so big. It's bacing up constantly from about 6pm to about 10am, then every 15 minutes for the archive logs!
Great fun...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-14-2001 07:07 AM
03-14-2001 07:07 AM
Re: OmniBack Cell Manager
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-16-2001 08:42 AM
03-16-2001 08:42 AM
Re: OmniBack Cell Manager
However it now says that the CDB was created on a different cell, so I can't report, export or in fact do anything with it!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-19-2001 05:42 AM
03-19-2001 05:42 AM
Re: OmniBack Cell Manager
Maybe the command omnidbutil -change_cell_name
can help you.
This option changes owner of catalog database to current cell server.
Clovis Borges.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-26-2001 08:45 AM
03-26-2001 08:45 AM
Re: OmniBack Cell Manager
Sorry I did not reply sooner. I've been out of the office.
I'm also sorry I can not tell you all the steps to bring the database up on another system. I've had casual discussions about it with an OB instructor and the RC. We never got down to details. They did make it sound as easy as just copying those files over to the new system. Maybe the suggestion from Clovis will do the trick.
If I come across more information I'll post it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-27-2001 05:44 AM
03-27-2001 05:44 AM
Re: OmniBack Cell Manager
The -change_cell_name thing worked a treat!
Sy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-27-2001 10:56 AM
03-27-2001 10:56 AM
Re: OmniBack Cell Manager
I would look closely at the output from /opt/omni/bin/omnirpt -report db_size -ascii
and /opt/omni/sbin/omnidbutil -extendinfo
and see just how much space might be regained by doing the readascii.
This really is one of the week points of omniback. HP recommends regular write/readascii to keep the catalog healthy but how does one do this when the readascii is so slow (it takes 4 times as long as the write). This is one of the reasons we are considering different backup software.
Henry
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-27-2001 11:17 AM
03-27-2001 11:17 AM