HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Oracle 9.2 memory size.
Operating System - HP-UX
1832891
Members
2532
Online
110048
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-29-2006 03:06 AM
06-29-2006 03:06 AM
Oracle 9.2 memory size.
Hi
Having recently converted to oracle, it would seem each connection is taking a lot more memory than previously. Could someone confirm my thoughts ?
On a non converted system
ps -efl | grep pid shows a SZ of 2586 (around 10mb of RSS or used RAM)
A converted system for the same running application process shows SZ as 16846 (65mb of RSS or used RAM)
Is this correct as the new oracle version seems much hungrier and Im thinking needs to be tuned down.
Thanks
Having recently converted to oracle, it would seem each connection is taking a lot more memory than previously. Could someone confirm my thoughts ?
On a non converted system
ps -efl | grep pid shows a SZ of 2586 (around 10mb of RSS or used RAM)
A converted system for the same running application process shows SZ as 16846 (65mb of RSS or used RAM)
Is this correct as the new oracle version seems much hungrier and Im thinking needs to be tuned down.
Thanks
Argh ye land lovers !
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-29-2006 04:21 AM
06-29-2006 04:21 AM
Re: Oracle 9.2 memory size.
It may not be hungrier -- it may simply be getting larger pages to improve performance [whether it needs them or not is always the question].
Check the chatr settings on the new binary for data page size (man chatr for details on this, look at the +pd / +pi sections), and check your tunable settings for vps_ceiling, vps_chatr_ceiling and vps_pagesize. [If you're running 11i v2, there's a man page for each in man 5... otherwise, http://docs.hp.com/en/TKP-90202/re105.html is a start to the 11.11 documentation].
Check the chatr settings on the new binary for data page size (man chatr for details on this, look at the +pd / +pi sections), and check your tunable settings for vps_ceiling, vps_chatr_ceiling and vps_pagesize. [If you're running 11i v2, there's a man page for each in man 5... otherwise, http://docs.hp.com/en/TKP-90202/re105.html is a start to the 11.11 documentation].
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-29-2006 04:33 AM
06-29-2006 04:33 AM
Re: Oracle 9.2 memory size.
Shalom,
Check the settings of the oracle SGA. This can have an impact on memory consumption as well.
SEP
Check the settings of the oracle SGA. This can have an impact on memory consumption as well.
SEP
Steven E Protter
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-29-2006 04:45 AM
06-29-2006 04:45 AM
Re: Oracle 9.2 memory size.
Your sort_area_size is the biggest determinant of how large each individual connection gets.
But, don't set that too small, as you'll start doing sorts on disk, instead of in memory.
However, I think the size of around 10Mb per is fine, depending what you're trying to get done in each. I've got many that will go as large as 30Mb toward the end of the day.
And yes, over time, the connections in Oracle seem to hog more memory in each sucessive version, as well as the database footprint on disk and in SGA memory as well.
But, don't set that too small, as you'll start doing sorts on disk, instead of in memory.
However, I think the size of around 10Mb per is fine, depending what you're trying to get done in each. I've got many that will go as large as 30Mb toward the end of the day.
And yes, over time, the connections in Oracle seem to hog more memory in each sucessive version, as well as the database footprint on disk and in SGA memory as well.
We are the people our parents warned us about --Jimmy Buffett
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP