- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: parameter settings
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-03-2002 12:44 AM
09-03-2002 12:44 AM
parameter settings
These are
max_thread_proc <= nkthread
and we have
max_thread_proc = 20000
nkthread = 2048
ncallout >=nproc
and we have
ncallout = 2064
nprocs = 16820
Does anyone know if it will be a problem to change these settiings to ones that SAM allows?
This would mean our know values would be
ncallout = 16836
nkthread = 29451
The system these settings are on is a L class running HPUX 11 with three processors and 16gb of memory.
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-03-2002 12:50 AM
09-03-2002 12:50 AM
Re: parameter settings
There are also similar restraints on the values of other parameters (the sem* set for example)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-03-2002 02:27 AM
09-03-2002 02:27 AM
Re: parameter settings
some kernel parameters values depend on other values. they may have formulae, which involve other parameter values. so change values in an order by observing the messages.
regds
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-03-2002 02:56 AM
09-03-2002 02:56 AM
Re: parameter settings
ncallout should be
so you can modify those values and do a build
# cd /stand/build
# /usr/lbin/sysadm/system_prep -s system
# vi system
Make your changes
Save the file
# mk_kernel -s system
Once successful you need to put the new kernel in place.
# mv /stand/vmunix /stand/vmunix.prev
# mv /stand/build/vmunix /stand/vmunix
# cd /
# shutdown -r -y 0
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-03-2002 04:16 AM
09-03-2002 04:16 AM
Re: parameter settings
You have a limit on the number of processes your OS can handle, like around 30K. I'm not too sure why one would need to allow ONE process to HAVE 20000 threads (max_thread_proc)?? You'll also have to increase the number of files allowed to be open (nfile) and inodes (ninode).
live free or die
harry
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-03-2002 06:31 AM
09-03-2002 06:31 AM
Re: parameter settings
keith
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-03-2002 06:37 AM
09-03-2002 06:37 AM
Re: parameter settings
ninode = 19088
Most of our filesystems are Vxfs
Is this going to be a problem??
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-03-2002 07:13 AM
09-03-2002 07:13 AM
Re: parameter settings
a value of ninode is not the concern it once was though I would recommend reducing it to 3,000 on the high side, 1,000 on the low side. JFS file systems have their own kernel identifier and it is not only dynamic but also a linked list - ninode has no affect on the JFS kernel inode structure.
Keith
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-03-2002 07:20 AM
09-03-2002 07:20 AM
Re: parameter settings
Would having this value set so high have performance issues
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-03-2002 07:39 AM
09-03-2002 07:39 AM
Re: parameter settings
It probably won't cause any discernable problem because the processor(s) is/are quite fast and improvement in some of the kernel table management have greatly reduced the impact of large values of ninode. If anything, you may have a little extra system mode on the processor util, but I don't think it would noticeably degrade throughput.
keith