Operating System - HP-UX
1848590 Members
5350 Online
104033 Solutions
New Discussion

Performance degraded after new year!!

 
Andreas D. Skjervold
Honored Contributor

Performance degraded after new year!!

Hi!
In our production system we are having some performance problems.
The system is running on hp-ux 10.20 on a K-class server, with Oracle 8.0.5 databases processing telecom data by the millions pr day.
The performance was suddenly degraded to a low 30 % of the baseline performance from last year.
This happened on january 01 2001 at 00:00 GMT!!! and has remained as such.

The production team is currently working on this in cooperation with the different software vendors.

As sysadm for the telecom developers I wanted to post this question to check if there's anyone out there that have experienced or heard of similar occurances.

Heard of anything like it??

Andreas
Only by ignoring what everyone think is important, can you be aware of what everyone ignores!
3 REPLIES 3
Paula J Frazer-Campbell
Honored Contributor

Re: Performance degraded after new year!!

Hi
I presume that you patched fully for the Y2K thing.
If not then I suggest you do so.
Why you may ask -

I would guess that a 1 year lookback could be to blame,
ie somthing in your system is looking backwards and at 00:00 01/01/2001 looked back to 00:00 01/01/2000.
As it is still running albeit slow I would say that it is resolving the problem but not very well.
Does the processed data involve time/data stamps and if so is the post Y2001 data correct.

Just an idea

Paula
If you can spell SysAdmin then you is one - anon
Tim Malnati
Honored Contributor

Re: Performance degraded after new year!!

I agree with Paula on this. If you find that all your patching is up to date, I would definitely get Oracle support involved too. It's quite possible that there is a Y2K issue that was missed and the volume that you are processing has caused the beast to become painfully known.
Andreas D. Skjervold
Honored Contributor

Re: Performance degraded after new year!!

Hi again!
After closer examination, it turns out that the change didn't occure so suddenly as it first seemed. It happened gradually over a couple of hours as the telecom data with the new years timestamp started to arrive.
This implies a possible problem with the application or the Oracle indexes that includes the timestamp.

So; hp-ux might not be to blame, but thanks for the input anyway.

rgds
Andreas
Only by ignoring what everyone think is important, can you be aware of what everyone ignores!