- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: PVLinks v Securepath failover - only 1 way? - ...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-04-2007 07:44 PM
07-04-2007 07:44 PM
We have an rx6600 with HP-UX 11i v2 with dual fc controllers connected to a SAN with an EVA8000 storage subsystem.
THe rx6600 is using PVlinks for to handle the FC controller redundancy.
We have found that with PVlinks the LUNs will only failover once. PVlinks does not failback when the primary path is restored. We need to do a reboot to achieve this. Is this the correct behaviour of PVlinks?
We have been told that Securepath will sort out this problem, will Securepath be a better option?
Appreciate any input you can share.
Thanks
Andrew
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-05-2007 01:02 AM
07-05-2007 01:02 AM
Re: PVLinks v Securepath failover - only 1 way? - EVA8000
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-05-2007 01:24 AM
07-05-2007 01:24 AM
Re: PVLinks v Securepath failover - only 1 way? - EVA8000
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-05-2007 01:35 AM
07-05-2007 01:35 AM
Re: PVLinks v Securepath failover - only 1 way? - EVA8000
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-05-2007 03:05 AM
07-05-2007 03:05 AM
Re: PVLinks v Securepath failover - only 1 way? - EVA8000
I strongly recommend secure path ( which is going away in favor of bill's DMIO). i dont know why you guys are using pvlinks in a EVA8000
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-05-2007 11:42 AM
07-05-2007 11:42 AM
SolutionFor PVlinks to failback to the primary path, you need to have the "autoswitch" set on the PV.
You can check the autoswitch status using 'pvdisplay /dev/dsk/cxtydz' and you can set it using the 'pvchange -S y /dev/dsk/cxtydz'.
Note that recent LVM patches have improved the failover times of PVlinks.
Regards,
Jean-Marc