- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Ram Avg Util
Operating System - HP-UX
1759888
Members
3478
Online
108889
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-20-2007 05:16 AM
02-20-2007 05:16 AM
Re: Ram Avg Util
The default value of 50% for the buffer cache is simply a bad value. Since you are running 11.23, the buffer cache code was heavily updated to improve performance so that the recommended maximum for dbc_max_pct could be larger than 800-1500 megs. For a very busy system (at 11.23), 4GB to 6Gb can be useful.
But your metric 80% isn't meaningful. You need to define the amount of local process memory, shared memory and the buffer cache. 80% is not right if you paid lots of money for your RAM...a better value is 95% or higher. After all, this is not a PeeCee where the system becomes unstable or crashes when all memory is used. If you have terminated all your applications, then local process memory will be very small but if you trashed the applications by using kill -9, then shared memory and other IPCS objects are left orphaned in RAM.
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
But your metric 80% isn't meaningful. You need to define the amount of local process memory, shared memory and the buffer cache. 80% is not right if you paid lots of money for your RAM...a better value is 95% or higher. After all, this is not a PeeCee where the system becomes unstable or crashes when all memory is used. If you have terminated all your applications, then local process memory will be very small but if you trashed the applications by using kill -9, then shared memory and other IPCS objects are left orphaned in RAM.
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-20-2007 10:40 PM
02-20-2007 10:40 PM
Re: Ram Avg Util
OK Bill
thank you very much. I'm tuning my system and I changed the value of dbc_max_pct. I'm monitoring the system resource and my applications and it's seems that works very well.
thanks again to all
regards
Max
thank you very much. I'm tuning my system and I changed the value of dbc_max_pct. I'm monitoring the system resource and my applications and it's seems that works very well.
thanks again to all
regards
Max
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP