- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: rasing maxuprc value - dependencies ?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-01-2004 09:07 PM
02-01-2004 09:07 PM
We have system (HP-UX 11.11) where the kernel parameter maxuprc is set to 320 and now we have problem with to many database connections and the system can't fork more processess for that user. I have countinously raised these parameter but I'am not aware of consequences of rasing this to much - are there any important dependencies that should be considered ?
regards/
Henrik
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-01-2004 09:23 PM
02-01-2004 09:23 PM
Re: rasing maxuprc value - dependencies ?
Database tend to have a rather high maxuprc (1024 is not abnormal) because one user (install user) will own all the processes.
Next to maxuprc, nproc should be set high enough (follow up with "sar -v").
regards,
Thierry.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-01-2004 09:30 PM
02-01-2004 09:30 PM
Re: rasing maxuprc value - dependencies ?
I think it is not an issue. Try to run Oracle instances using different user accounts...
For example, orauser1 runs oradb1 database. orauser2 runs oradb2 database etc.
Thanks
Vijay
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-01-2004 10:25 PM
02-01-2004 10:25 PM
Re: rasing maxuprc value - dependencies ?
maxuprc-->user limit no. of processes
nproc-->total number of processes on the system.
http://docs.hp.com/hpux/onlinedocs/939/KCParms/KCparam.MaxUprc.html
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-02-2004 01:48 AM
02-02-2004 01:48 AM
SolutionOther than that maxuprc should be less than nproc (SAM will not alow to configure it ofcourse), there isn't much I would worry about raising this parameter. If your application requires it, then you can. However, just keep track of what is happening on the system. A bad script or program can fork numourous child processes unnecessarily.
-Sri
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-02-2004 07:40 PM
02-02-2004 07:40 PM
Re: rasing maxuprc value - dependencies ?
Henrik